Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 23 The decision surface of fuzzy controller
i
i
S i
ðÞ ¼
e ;
min
l
A ðÞ; l
B
ðÞ
ð
42
Þ
e ;
U cfG ¼
max S i
ð
ðÞ
Þ
ð
43
Þ
The discourse universe of output U cf currency in
ve
fields (Fig. 23 )
ect a probably smooth law of order
what provides us an energy saving on the output of the fuzzy controller (Fig. 24 ).
The decision surface of fuzzy controller re
fl
4.4 Simulation Results of Fuzzy Controller
The response of the
fl
flow if the system is regulated by the fuzzy controller exceeds
ow (8 m 3
the maximum
h) accepted by the station of irrigation. One thus proposes
to add a saturation to compensate for this going beyond (Figs. 25 , 26 , 27 and, 28 ).
fl
=
4.5 Comparative Study
Taking into account the results obtained, we note that for the two examples of
regulators, the fuzzy approach suggested makes it possible to obtain the best speed
ratio/energy of order however the fuzzy regulation brings a static error to the
evolution of the two outputs. The recourse has a pro
it inserted into the exit makes it
possible to reduce this error (Fig. 29 , Tables 3 and 4 ).
The fuzzy controller ensures perfectly the control of the irrigation station by
sprinkling, on the other hand regulator PI used in the model appears robust from
point of view stabilization in transitory mode (Fig. 30 ).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search