Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 5 Performance based
on sampling bias
p
Size
Entropy
Accuracy
False
alarm
Risk
Base
17,748
0.7423
92.51
0.063
0.091
0.25
13,840
0.7716
93.4211
0.064
0.068
0.50
9,932
0.8181
94.9899
0.049
0.051
0.75
6,025
0.9038
96.0526
0.038
0.041
1.0
2,852
0.9993
97.5202
0.021
0.03
Figure 14 shows operational rule formed using two attributes, namely reactive
reserves at Chevire unit and Chinon unit respectively. The operating conditions
shown in the Fig. 14 are from the entire database. It can be noticed that the rules
formed using the database exclusively from the boundary region is providing more
operating conditions to be exploited in real time situations, than the rule derived
using the database from entire region; because of the increased knowledge and
clarity of the boundary limits.
Sampling Strategies Comparison
Table 7 shows the comparison results of two different sampling approaches,
namely,
1. Importance sampling (IS) of boundary region, with load distribution modeled
with multivariate normal (MVN) distribution (pruned tree).
2. Importance sampling of boundary region, with load distribution modeled with
correlated non-parametric multivariate distribution (MVD) (pruned tree).
3. Same as case 2, with un-pruned tree.
Table 6 Economic benefit from efficient sampling
Top Node
p = 0
p = 1
Cordemais voltage
401.64 kV
399.88 kV
Domloup voltage
397.56 kV
394.51 kV
Louisfert voltage
399.1 kV
396.46 kV
Plaine-Haute voltage
392.26 kV
387.21 kV
Chevire unit reactive reserve
131.38 Mvar
90.76 Mvar
Chinon unit reactive reserve
1,127.54 Mvar
694.62 Mvar
Cordemais unit reactive reserve
70.97 Mvar
16.23 Mvar
Total SEO region reactive reserve
7,395.88 Mvar
6,510.36 Mvar
Plaine-Haute SVC output
11.82 Mvar
13.64 Mvar
Poteau-Rouge SVC output
16.3 Mvar
22.03 Mvar
Search WWH ::




Custom Search