Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
'
to an equal or smaller one. This is however the main rule of the
concept tree and there is some mathematical justi
measurement
'
cation or foundation to it. Some
of the evidence was found after the creation of the concept tree, more than the
concept tree has been derived from it. However, if it can be used to support the
general model or theory, then why not specify it here. The main point to note is the
fact that base concepts should probably be the most frequently occurring ones
statistically. That is probably a sound enough idea, based on statistics alone. If
trying to compare to a real-world physical law, then if tree branches were allowed to
become larger again, the tree would probably break at that place. This might be an
opportunistic statement, but it is completely the idea behind the triangular counting
rule. Other pieces of evidence that might provide support are listed in the following
sections.
6.1 Problem Decomposition
Any sub-entity must be smaller than the entity it belongs to. This is particularly
relevant to the process of problem decomposition that is used to solve large and
dif
cult problems. The larger problem is broken down into smaller ones, until each
smaller problem is simple enough to be solved. So this is another application of the
natural ordering. It is also the case that you cannot be a sub-concept of something
that does not exist. If thinking about Markov models, then one construction of these
will count the number of occurrences, of transitions from one state to another. This
process will necessarily require the
first and therefore, if the
model is tree-like without loops, each parent state must have a larger or the same
count value as the following state, as part of the same rule. Similar to concept trees,
Markov models have been used for text classi
'
from
'
state to exist
cation or prediction, as well as state-
based models.
6.2 Clustering and Energy
Some of the research that has looked at clustering processes, for example, the single
link theory (Sibson 1973 ) might provide support. This original theory proposed that
any node should link to its closest neighbour. These small clusters could then link
to their nearest neighbours in the next iteration, and so on. Therefore, through only
one link from each group, at each iteration, larger clusters can eventually be formed.
It is interesting to note that if there is a certain ordering of the nodes, this process
will work particularly well. A measurement of closeness depends on what is being
measured and also the evaluation criteria. However, suppose that spatial distance is
the metric, where a line of evaluated nodes can only cluster with the node on either
side
necessarily being the closest nodes. Consider the two sets of nodes, repre-
sented by Figs. 4 and 5 . In these
figures, each node value is represented by its height
Search WWH ::




Custom Search