Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
observing the effects on the decision. This is useful in situations where uncertainties
exist in the de
nition of the importance of different factors. In our case, we will
conduct sensitivity analysis to see the importance of criteria weights in evaluating
supplier quality.
3.4 Results Validation
To validate the model results, we will compare the results of our study with another
standard approach called Fuzzy Simple Aggregated Weighting (SAW). This
method is de
ned as follows.
3.4.1 Fuzzy SAW
Let w j represent the weight of the criteria j and x ij represents the rating of alternative
i against criteria j.
Step 1: Normalize the data using the following equations.
x ij
max
i
r ij ¼
8
¼
;
; ...;
;
¼
;
; ...;
ð
Þ
ð 15 Þ
i
1
2
m
j
1
2
n
benefit type criteria
f x ij g
min
i
x ij g
x ij
f
r ij ¼
8
i
¼
1
;
2
; ...;
m
;
j
¼
1
;
2
; ...;
n
ð
cost type criteria
Þ
ð 16 Þ
Step 2: Calculate the overall performance rating ui i for alternative i by aggre-
gating the product of its various criteria values with their respective
weights.
X
u i ¼
w j x ij
ð 17 Þ
j
Step 3: Select
the alternative with the highest overall performance value
u i 8 i ¼
1
;
2
; ... m
Search WWH ::




Custom Search