Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Figure 12 UpperPanel: Cartoon showing a hybrid system for light-driven CO
2
reduction using
CODH I
Ch
on CdS nanoparticles. Numbers refer to potentials in V
versus
SHE. D represents an
electron donor. LowerPanel: Comparisons of the performance of CODH I
Ch
adsorbed on various
CdS nanoparticles: NR
¼
nanorods, QD
¼
quantum dots, CdS
calc
¼
calcined sample. Adapted with
permission from [
62
]; copyright 2012 Royal Society of Chemistry.
We have already discussed how CODH I
Ch
and CODH II
Ch
attached to graphite
electrodes show high activities of CO oxidation and CO
2
reduction with a minimal
overpotential [
17
]. The catalytic bias is largely determined by the fact that the reduction
potential of the D-cluster lies in the region of the potential for the CO
2
/CO redox couple
[
47
]. When TiO
2
or CdS are used as electrode materials, the electrocatalytic activity is
biased instead strongly in favor of CO
2
reduction, an observation that is explained by
the potential dependence of electron availability in the material. Semiconductors have a
low carrier density and, in simplistic physics terms, the availability of electrons for
transfer into a catalyst is governed by the position of the flatband potential
E
FB
.Both
TiO
2
and CdS are
n
-type semiconductors and a potential more negative than
E
FB
is
required for electrons to become concentrated close to the surface and available for
transfer. At potentials well above
E
FB
no current flows. Results comparing CODH I
Ch
Search WWH ::
Custom Search