Graphics Reference
In-Depth Information
Proof of Theorem 1:
Suppose
a
j
/
∈{
t
j
+1
,
···
,t
j
+
k−
1
}
. We can apply the divided difference equation
(7.22) [
τ
i
,
,τ
i
+
k
] on both sides of equation (7.22). Multiplying also by
τ
i
+
k
−
τ
i
, equation (7.14) follows. Since the right-hand side of equation (7.22) is
constant as a function of
a
j
∈
···
[
t
j
,t
j
+
k
),
α
i,k
(
j
) is also independent of
a
j
. One
can then let
a
j
∈{
and take limits from either left or right.
We next describe a recurrence relation in Theorem 2 for
α
i,k
(
j
). One can
see its proof in the article by Cohen et al. [41].
Theorem 2
:
Suppose
τ
i
+
k
>τ
i
and that
α
i,k
(
j
) is given by equation (7.15). Then
t
j
+1
,···,t
j
+
k−
1
}
α
i,
1
(
j
)=1
,
τ
i
≤
t
j
<τ
i
+
j
,
(7.24)
=0
,
otherwise.
Moreover for
k
≥
2 and for all
i, j
,
α
i,k
(
j
)=(
t
j
+
k−
1
−
τ
i
)
β
i,k−
1
(
j
)+(
τ
i
+
k
−
t
j
+
k−
1
)
β
i
+1
,k−
1
(
j
)
,
(7.25)
where
β
i,k
(
j
)=
α
i,k
(
j
)
/
(
τ
i
+
k
−
τ
i
)
,
τ
i
+
k
>τ
i
,
(7.26)
=0
,
otherwise.
The discrete splines
α
i,k
(
j
) is thus seen to have properties similar to those for
B
i,k
.
7.2.2 Some Properties of
α
i,k
(
j
)
If
α
i,k
(
j
) are as in Theorem 2, then we can consider some of its properties in
the following corollary.
Corollary 1:
(1)
α
i,k
(
j
)=0for
i/
∈{
μ
−
k
+1
,
···
,μ
}
with 1
≤
j
≤
m
and
μ
be such that
τ
μ
≤
t
j
<τ
μ
+1
;
(2)
α
i,k
(
j
)
≥
0
,
∀
(
i, j
);
n
(3)
α
i,k
(
j
)=1
,τ
k
≤
t
j
<τ
n
+1
.
i
=1
Property (1) says that for each
j
, there are at most
k
discrete B-splines
α
μ−k
+1
,k
(
j
)
,
,α
μ,k
(
j
) with a (possible) nonzero value.
One can now compute
d
j
in equation (7.7) when
P
i
s are known. Equation
(7.7) can be written as
···
n
d
(
j
)=
α
i,k
P
i
.
(7.27)
i
=1
α
i,k
(
j
) is a discrete B-spline and
d
(
j
) is a linear combination of
α
i,k
(
j
)and
so it is a discrete B-spline. Discrete splines have local support, as can be seen
Search WWH ::
Custom Search