Graphics Reference
In-Depth Information
Proof of Theorem 1:
Suppose a j /
∈{
t j +1 ,
···
,t j + k− 1 }
. We can apply the divided difference equation
(7.22) [ τ i ,
i + k ] on both sides of equation (7.22). Multiplying also by τ i + k
τ i , equation (7.14) follows. Since the right-hand side of equation (7.22) is
constant as a function of a j
···
[ t j ,t j + k ), α i,k ( j ) is also independent of a j . One
can then let a j ∈{
and take limits from either left or right.
We next describe a recurrence relation in Theorem 2 for α i,k ( j ). One can
see its proof in the article by Cohen et al. [41].
Theorem 2 :
Suppose τ i + k i and that α i,k ( j ) is given by equation (7.15). Then
t j +1 ,···,t j + k− 1 }
α i, 1 ( j )=1 ,
τ i
t j i + j ,
(7.24)
=0 ,
otherwise.
Moreover for k
2 and for all i, j ,
α i,k ( j )=( t j + k− 1
τ i ) β i,k− 1 ( j )+( τ i + k
t j + k− 1 ) β i +1 ,k− 1 ( j ) ,
(7.25)
where
β i,k ( j )= α i,k ( j ) / ( τ i + k
τ i ) ,
τ i + k i ,
(7.26)
=0 ,
otherwise.
The discrete splines α i,k ( j ) is thus seen to have properties similar to those for
B i,k .
7.2.2 Some Properties of α i,k ( j )
If α i,k ( j ) are as in Theorem 2, then we can consider some of its properties in
the following corollary.
Corollary 1:
(1) α i,k ( j )=0for i/
∈{
μ
k +1 ,
···
}
with 1
j
m and μ be such that
τ μ
t j μ +1 ;
(2) α i,k ( j )
0 ,
( i, j );
n
(3)
α i,k ( j )=1 k
t j n +1 .
i =1
Property (1) says that for each j , there are at most k discrete B-splines
α μ−k +1 ,k ( j ) ,
μ,k ( j ) with a (possible) nonzero value.
One can now compute d j in equation (7.7) when P i s are known. Equation
(7.7) can be written as
···
n
d ( j )=
α i,k P i .
(7.27)
i =1
α i,k ( j ) is a discrete B-spline and d ( j ) is a linear combination of α i,k ( j )and
so it is a discrete B-spline. Discrete splines have local support, as can be seen
Search WWH ::




Custom Search