Graphics Reference
In-Depth Information
n
f
(
x
)=
B
i,k
(
x
)
P
i
i
=1
n
m
=
P
i
α
i,k
(
j
)
N
j,k
(
x
)
i
=1
j
=1
m
n
=
[
P
i
α
i,k
(
j
)]
N
j,k
(
x
)
j
=1
i
=1
where
α
i,k
(
j
) is given by equation (7.15). Comparing this with equation (7.7),
we get the following statement:
(3) For
k
= 1, from equation (7.15),
a
j
)
0
+
−
a
j
)
0
+
.
α
i,
1
(
j
)=(
τ
i
+1
−
(
τ
i
−
(7.17)
It agrees with
α
i,
1
(
j
) given by case 1, for any
a
j
∈
[
t
j
,t
j
+1
). Similarly, for
k
= 2 we get,
α
i,
2
(
j
)=[
τ
i
+1
,τ
i
+2
]
φ
j,
2
−
[
τ
i,τ
i
+1
]
φ
j,
2
with
a
j
)
0
+
(
y
t
j
+1
)
.
This agrees with
α
i,
2
(
j
) for the case 2, described above, for any
a
j
ν
[
t
j
.t
j
+2
).
Now to prove Theorem 1, we present two lemmas. The first lemma is due
to Marsden [120].
Lemma 1
:
For any
y
φ
j,
2
(
y
)=(
y
−
−
∈
and any
x
∈
[
t
k
,t
m
+1
), we have
m
x
)
k−
1
=
(
y
−
Ψ
j,k
(
y
)
N
j,k
(
x
)
,
(7.18)
j
=1
where
Ψ
j,k
is given by equation (7.5).
Proof
(deBoor [53]):
m
For
k
= 1 we get from the lemma 1, 1 =
N
j,
1
(
x
), which follows from
j
=1
equation (7.10). For
k
≥
2, one can use the recurrence relation of deBoor [53],
Cox [47]
N
j,k
(
x
)=(
x
−
t
j
)
Q
j,k−
1
(
x
)+(
t
j
+
k
−
x
)
Q
j
+1
,k−
1
(
x
)
,
(7.19)
where
Q
j,k
(
x
)=
N
j,k
(
x
)
/
(
t
j
+
k
−
t
j
)
,
t
j
+
k
>t
j
,
(7.20)
=0
,
otherwise.
Letting
ζ
k
=(
y
−
x
)
k−
1
in equation (7.18), we get
Search WWH ::
Custom Search