Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
0
@
2
4
3
5
½
P
½
K eq
Q
f 1
Ka 1 Kb
½
A
½
B
v
¼
V mf
½
Ka 1 þ
½
Kb þ
½½
Ka 1 Kb þ
½
Kp þ
½
Kq þ
½½
KpKq þ
½½
Ka 1 Kq þ
½½
KpKb
1
þ
(9.2)
2
4
3
5
1
A
f 2
Ka 2 Kb
½½
K eq
½
A
½
B
þ
½
Ka 2 þ
A
½
Kb þ
B
½
Ka 2 Kb þ
½
A
B
½
Kp þ
P
½
Kq þ
Q
½
½
KpKq þ
P
Q
½
Ka 2 Kq þ
½
A
Q
½
½
KpKb
P
B
1
þ
2
4
3
5
! 1
!
þ β 1F2 ; 6B P
α 1 Ka F2 ; 6BP1
AT ½
K ATP1
f 1
F2
;
6 BP
½
ATP
1
þ
1
þ
α
1 Ka F2 ; 6BP1
K ATP1
0
@
1
A
2
4
3
5
3
6 BP
α 1 Ka F2 ; 6BP1
F2
;
6 BP
α 1 Ka F2 ; 6BP1
F2
;
F6P 1 þ
F6P 1 þ
1
þ
6 BP
Ka F2 ; 6BP1
F2
;
6BP
Ka F2 ; 6BP1
F2
;
K F6P1 1 þ
K F 6 P 1 1 þ
4
4
2
4
3
5
4
CIT
½
Ki CIT1
ATP
½
Ki ATP1
F2 ; 6 BP
L 11 þ
1 þ
F6P 1 þ
α
1 Ka F2
;
6BP1
4
þ
1
þ
F2 ; 6 BP
Ka F2 ; 6BP1
F2
;
6 BP
K F6P1 1 þ
1 þ
Ka F2
;
6BP1
0
1
1
1
½ FB ½
K ADP K FBP K eq
ADP
@
A
A
A þ
AD ½
K ADP þ
FB ½
K FBP þ
½ FB ½
K ADP K FBP þ
ADP
1
v
¼
V mf
(9.3)
! 1
!
½
K ATP2
ATP
þ β 2F2 ; 6 BP
α 2 Ka F2 ; 6BP2
f 2
½
F2 ; 6 BP
α 2 Ka F2 ; 6BP2
ATP
1
þ
1
þ
K ATP2
0
1
2
3
3
F2 ; 6 BP
α 2 Ka F2
F2 ; 6 BP
α 2 Ka F2
F6P 1
þ
F6P 1
þ
@
A
1
4
5
;
6BP2
;
6BP2
þ
F2 ; 6 BP
Ka F2
F2 ; 6 BP
Ka F2
K F6P2 1
þ
K F6P2 1
þ
;
6BP2
;
6BP2
4
4
2
4
3
5
4
CIT
½
Ki CIT2
ATP
½
Ki ATP2
F2
;
6BP
L 21 þ
1 þ
F6P 1 þ
α
2 Ka F2 ; 6BP2
4
þ
þ
1
6BP
Ka F2 ; 6BP2
F2
;
F2 ; 6 BP
Ka F2
K F6P2 1 þ
1 þ
;
6BP2
0
@
1
A
1
A
1
A
½
K ADP K FBP K eq
½
ADP
FBP
AD ½
K ADP þ
FB ½
K FBP þ
½ FB ½
K ADP K FBP þ
ADP
1
Model simulations indicated a marginal increase of 5-13 % in metabolite
concentration, fluxes, and flux control coefficients under normoxic conditions
compared with the model with no different isoforms (Tables 9.4 and 9.5 ). This
result contrasted with the changes observed when GLUT3, alone or in combination
with HKI, replaced GLUT1 (Tables 9.1 and 9.2 ). This behavior can be explained by
the much lower expression of GLUT3 compared to GLUT1 (Fig. 9.2 and
Table 9.3 ).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search