Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Treatment Option
Advantages
Disadvantages
Sequestering
Operationally simple—only chemical feed and storage required
Does not remove iron and manganese—only holds them in
solution
Inexpensive
Suitable for wellhead treatment
Effectiveness exhausted after 48 to 72 hr, which could lead to
staining problems for large storage volumes and long dead-end
pipelines
Does not produce residuals that have to be handled
Addition of phosphorus could enhance biological growth in
distribution system
A free chlorine residual must be maintained in the system to
minimize regrowth
Aeration and filtration
Can reduce high concentrations of iron
Generally considered to be unsuccessful for manganese removal at
neutral pH
Simple to operate and maintain
No chemicals to handle
Repumping usually required
Not effective for removal of organically complexed iron
Chlorination and
filtration
Effective for Fe removal
Not effective on Mn without high pH and long detention time
Operationally simple and stable
Not effective on organically complexed iron
Able to provide primary disinfection benefits
Readily accepted by regulatory agencies
KMnO 4 and filtration
Widely used and effective method for both Fe and Mn removal
Potential to overdose the KMnO 4 , which could cause pink water
complaints
Rapid reaction to oxidize both metals
Operationally simple
High chemical costs
Readily accepted by regulatory agencies
Not effective on organically complexed iron without a clarification
step
KMnO 4 is corrosive, so special handling is required
Ozonation and
filtration
Effective for both Fe and Mn removal
Potential to overoxidize Mn to permanganate, causing pink water
Provides benefits in terms of taste and odor
High capital and energy costs
Able to provide primary disinfection benefits
On-site generation required
No chemicals to buy or store
Ozone equipment is complex and requires specialized servicing
TOC in the water could cause biological slime growth problems
in the system
Search WWH ::




Custom Search