Databases Reference
In-Depth Information
µ
1
µ
Figure 7.2
Geometrical interpretation of a coherent matched filter. The thick dashed line is the
locus of measurements such that [
R
−
1
(
1
−
0
)]
H
(
y
−
y
0
)
=
0
.
R
−
1
(
to produce the
real
log-likelihood ratio
L
, which is compared against a threshold. The
geometry of the log-likelihood ratio is illustrated in Fig.
7.2
: we choose lines parallel to
the thick dashed line in order to get the desired probability of false alarm
P
F
.
But how do we determine the threshold to get the desired
P
F
? We will see that the
deflection, or output signal-to-noise ratio, plays a key role here.
The centered complex measurement
y
−
y
0
is resolved onto the line
1
−
0
)
Definition 7.4.
The
deflection
for a likelihood-ratio test with log-likelihood ratio L is
defined as
E
0
(
L
)]
2
var
0
(
L
)
[
E
1
(
L
)
−
d
=
,
(7.25)
where
var
0
(
L
)
denotes the variance of L under H
0
.
We will first show that
L
given by (
7.23
) results in the deflection
1
−
0
)
H
R
−
1
(
d
=
(
1
−
0
)
,
(7.26)
which is simply the
output signal-to-noise ratio
. The mean of
L
is
d
/
2 under
H
1
and
−
2 under
H
0
, and its variance is
d
under both hypotheses. Thus, the log-likelihood
ratio statistic
L
is distributed as a real Gaussian random variable with mean value
d
/
2
and variance
d
. Thus,
L
has deflection, or output signal-to-noise ratio,
d
. In the general
non-Gaussian case, the deflection is much easier to compute than a complete ROC curve.
Now the false-alarm probability for the detector
±
d
/
φ
that compares
L
against a threshold
η
is
η
exp
2)
2
d
L
η
+
1
√
2
1
2
d
(
L
d
/
2
P
F
=
1
−
−
+
d
/
=
1
−
√
d
,
(7.27)
π
d
−∞
where
is the probability distribution function of a zero-mean, variance-one, real
Gaussian random variable. A similar calculation shows the probability of detection to
be
η
exp
2)
2
d
L
η
−
1
√
2
1
2
d
(
L
d
/
2
√
d
P
D
=
1
−
−
−
d
/
=
1
−
.
(7.28)
π
d
−∞
Search WWH ::
Custom Search