Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
14. Teraguchi M et al (2013) Prevalence and distribution of intervertebral disc degeneration over
the entire spine in a population-based cohort: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthritis
Cartilage
15. Schellhas KP et al (1996) Cervical discogenic pain. Prospective correlation of magnetic
resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic subjects and pain sufferers. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976) 21(3):300
312)
16. Boden SD et al (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in
asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(8):1178
311 (discussion 311
-
-
1184
17. Yoss RE et al (1957) Significance of symptoms and signs in localization of involved root in
cervical disk protrusion. Neurology 7(10):673
-
683
18. Majlesi J et al (2008) The sensitivity and speci
city of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising
tests in patients with lumbar disc herniation. J Clin Rheumatol 14(2):87
-
91
19. Bogduk N, Aprill C (1993) On the nature of neck pain, discography and cervical
zygapophysial joint blocks. Pain 54(2):213
-
217
20. Panagiotacopulos ND et al (1987) Water content in human intervertebral discs. Part I.
Measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12(9):912
-
917
21. Smith BM et al (1998) Interobserver reliability of detecting lumbar intervertebral disc high-
intensity zone on magnetic resonance imaging and association of high-intensity zone with pain
and anular disruption. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(19): 2074
-
2080
22. Aprill C, Bogduk N (1992) High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on
magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 65(773):361
-
369
23. Atlas SJ, Delitto A (2006) Spinal stenosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop
Relat Res 443:198
-
207
24. Andreisek G, Hodler J, Steurer J (2011) Uncertainties in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal
stenosis. Radiology 261(3):681
-
684
25. Kalichman L et al (2010) Computed tomography-evaluated features of spinal degeneration:
prevalence, intercorrelation, and association with self-reported low back pain. Spine J 10
(3):200
-
208
26. Hall S et al (1985) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical features, diagnostic procedures, and results
of surgical treatment in 68 patients. Ann Intern Med 103(2):271
-
275
27. Bednarik J et al (2011) Are subjects with spondylotic cervical cord encroachment at increased
risk of cervical spinal cord injury after minor trauma? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82
(7):779
-
781
28. Bracken MB et al (1990) A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in
the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the second national acute spinal cord
injury study. N Engl J Med 322(20):1405
-
1411
29. Kadanka Z et al (2005) Predictive factors for mild forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy
treated conservatively or surgically. Eur J Neurol 12(1):16
-
24
30. Karpova A et al (2013) Reliability of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging methods in the
assessment of spinal canal stenosis and cord compression in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976) 38(3):245
-
252
31. Kerkovsky M et al (2012) Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in patients with
cervical
-
spondylotic
spinal
cord
compression:
correlations
between
clinical
and
56
32. Uda T et al (2013) Assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy using diffusion tensor
magnetic resonance imaging parameter at 3.0 tesla. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(5):407
electrophysiological findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(1):48
-
414
33. Resnick D, Niwayama G (1976) Radiographic and pathologic features of spinal involvement
in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). Radiology 119(3):559
-
568
34. Utsinger PD (1985) Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Clin Rheum Dis 11(2):325
-
351
35. Weinfeld RM et al (1997) The prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) in
two large American Midwest metropolitan hospital populations. Skeletal Radiol 26
(4):222
-
225
36. Resnick D, Niwayama G (1998) Diagnosis of bone and joint disorder, 2nd edn
-
