Soundscape and Landscape Ecology - Soundscape Ecology: Principles, Patterns, Methods and Applications - page 27

reproductive process. Soundtopes represent sonic eco-fields necessary to track
specific resources such as mating or foraging.
Alteration of landscape structures, as in fragmentation, has important effects on
the sonic environment, and in particular, diversity and quality of individual song
repertoire have been proven to be impacted by the reduction of population size of
vocal species.
References
Bogaert J (2000) Quantifying habitat fragmentation as a spatial process in a patch-corridor-matrix
landscape model. PhD dissertation, Faculteit Wetenschappen, Departement Biologie, Univer-
sity of Antwerpen
Bouzid OM, Tian GY, Neasham J, Sharif B (2013) Investigation of sampling frequency
requirements for acoustic source localization using wireless sensor networks. Appl Acoust
74:269-274
Briefer E, Oiejuk TS, Rybak F, Aubin T (2010) Are bird song complexity and song sharing shaped
by habitat structure? An information theory and statistical approach. J Theor Biol 262:151-164
Brown AL, Kang J, Gjestland T (2011) Towards standardization in soundscape preference
assessment. Appl Acoust 72:387-392
Bucur V (2006) Urban forest acoustics. Springer, Berlin
Carles JL, Lopez Barrio I, de Lucio JV (1999) Sound influence on landscape values. Landsc Urban
Plan 43:191-200
Davies WJ (2013) Special issue: applied soundscapes. Appl Acoust 74:223
Farina A (2006) Principles and methods in landscape ecology. Toward a science of landscape.
Springer, Dordrecht
Farina A (2008) The landscape as a semiotic interface between organisms and resources.
Biosemiotics 1:75-83
Farina A (2012) A biosemiotic perspective of the resource criterion: toward a general theory of
resources. Biosemiotics 5:17-32
Farina A, Belgrano A (2004) The eco-field: a new paradigm for landscape ecology. Ecol Res
19:107-110
Farina A, Belgrano A (2006) The eco-field hypothesis: toward a cognitive landscape. Landsc Ecol
21:5-17
Farina A, Lattanzi E, Malavasi R, Pieretti N, Piccioli L (2011a) Avian soundscapes and cognitive
landscapes: theory, application and ecological perspectives. Landsc Ecol 26:1257-1267
Farina A, Pieretti N, Piccioli L (2011b) The soundscape methodology for long-term bird monitor-
ing: a Mediterranean Europe case-study. Ecol Inform 6:354-363
Farina A, Lattanzi E, Piccioli L, Pieretti N (2012) SoundscapeMeter, Bioacoustic Software:
Verion 1.0 Beta. www.disbef.uniurb.it\biomia\soundscapemeter
Gasc A, Sueur J, Jiguet F, Devictor V, Grandcolas P, Burrow C, Depraetere M, Pavoine S (2013)
Assessing biodiversity with sound: do acoustic diversity indices reflect phylogenetic and
functional diversities of bird communities? Ecol Indic 25:279-287
Hedfors P, Berg PG (2003) The sounds of two landscape settings: auditory concepts for physical
planning and design. Landsc Res 28(3):245-263
Hoffmeyer J (2008) The semiotic niche. J Mediterr Ecol 9:5-30
Jennings P, Cain R (2013) A framework for improving urban soundscapes. Appl Acoust
74:293-299
Krause B (1993) The niche hypothesis. Soundsc Newsl 6:6-10
Krause B (2012) The great animal orchestra. Little, Brown, New York