Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
2
is simply connected. Then every function η
∈
H
−
1
(
div
,)is uniquely decomposable in the form
6.1 Lemma.
Assume that
⊂ R
η
=∇
ψ
+
curl
p
(
6
.
5
)
with ψ
∈
H
0
() and p
∈
L
2
()/
R
. Moreover, the norms
1
2
2
1
,
2
η
H
−
1
(
div
,)
and
(
ψ
+
p
0
)
(
6
.
6
)
are equivalent, where p is the representer satisfying
pdx
=
0
.
Proof.
By hypothesis,
χ
:
div
η
∈
H
−
1
()
. Let
ψ
∈
H
0
()
be the solution
of the equation
ψ
=
χ
. Then div
(η
−∇
ψ)
=
=
0. By classical
estimates, every divergence-free function in
can be represented as a rotation, i.e.,
η
−∇
ψ
=
div
η
−
ψ
=
curl
p
with a suitable
p
∈
L
2
()/
R
. This establishes the decomposition.
We also observe that
div
η
−
1
=
ψ
−
1
=|
ψ
|
1
,
(
6
.
7
)
and
η
−
1
=∇
ψ
+
curl
p
−
1
≤∇
ψ
−
1
+
curl
p
−
1
≤
ψ
0
+
p
0
.
2
2
1
2
After summation, it follows that
0
.
In view of (6.7), to complete the proof we need only show that
η
H
−
1
(
div
,)
≤
2
ψ
+
2
p
p
≤
0
c
η
H
−
1
(
div
,)
. Note that
pdx
=
0. It is known from the Stokes problem (see
Problem III.6.7) that there exists a function
v
∈
H
0
()
2
with
div
v
=
p
and
v
1
≤
c
p
0
.
(
6
.
8
)
=
(
−
v
2
,v
1
)
, it clearly follows that
ξ
∈
H
0
()
2
,
Then for
ξ
=
(ξ
1
,ξ
2
)
:
rot
ξ
=
p
and
ξ
1
≤
c
p
0
.
Moreover, taking account of (6.7), we see that the decomposition (6.5) satisfies
2
0
p
=
(p,
rot
ξ)
=
(
curl
p, ξ)
=
(η
−∇
ψ, ξ)
≤
η
−
1
ξ
1
+|
ψ
|
1
ξ
0
≤
c(
η
−
1
+
div
η
−
1
)
p
0
.
Supplement.
If
η
lies in
L
2
()
2
and not just in
H
−
1
(
div
,)
, then we even have
p
∈
H
1
()/
R
for the second component of the Helmholtz decomposition (6.5),
Search WWH ::
Custom Search