Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
2 is simply connected. Then every function η
H 1 ( div ,)is uniquely decomposable in the form
6.1 Lemma. Assume that ⊂ R
η =∇ ψ +
curl p
( 6 . 5 )
with ψ H 0 () and p L 2 ()/ R . Moreover, the norms
1
2
2
1 ,
2
η H 1 ( div ,)
and
( ψ
+ p
0 )
( 6 . 6 )
are equivalent, where p is the representer satisfying pdx = 0 .
Proof. By hypothesis, χ :
div η H 1 () . Let ψ H 0 () be the solution
of the equation ψ = χ . Then div −∇ ψ) =
=
0. By classical
estimates, every divergence-free function in can be represented as a rotation, i.e.,
η −∇ ψ =
div η ψ =
curl p with a suitable p L 2 ()/ R
. This establishes the decomposition.
We also observe that
div η 1 = ψ 1 =| ψ | 1 ,
( 6 . 7 )
and
η 1 =∇ ψ +
curl p 1 ≤∇ ψ 1 +
curl p 1 ψ 0 + p 0 .
2
2
1
2
After summation, it follows that
0 .
In view of (6.7), to complete the proof we need only show that
η
H 1 ( div ,)
2
ψ
+
2
p
p
0
c η H 1 ( div ,) . Note that pdx =
0. It is known from the Stokes problem (see
Problem III.6.7) that there exists a function v H 0 () 2
with
div v = p
and
v 1 c p 0 .
( 6 . 8 )
= ( v 2 ,v 1 ) , it clearly follows that ξ H 0 () 2 ,
Then for ξ = 1 2 ) :
rot ξ = p
and
ξ 1 c p 0 .
Moreover, taking account of (6.7), we see that the decomposition (6.5) satisfies
2
0
p
= (p, rot ξ) = ( curl p, ξ) = −∇ ψ, ξ)
η 1 ξ 1 +| ψ | 1 ξ 0
c( η 1 +
div η 1 ) p 0 .
Supplement. If η lies in L 2 () 2
and not just in H 1 ( div ,) , then we even have
p H 1 ()/ R
for the second component of the Helmholtz decomposition (6.5),
Search WWH ::




Custom Search