Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Locking
The concept of locking effect is used frequently by engineers to describe the case
where a finite element computation produces significantly smaller displacements
than it should. In addition to volume locking , we also know shear locking , mem-
brane locking , and thickness locking as well as others with no special names. The
essential point is that because of a small parameter t , as in (3.28) the quotient C/α
grows, and the convergence of the finite element solution to the true solution is not
uniform in t as h
0. The papers of Arnold [1981], Babuska and Suri [1992], and
Suri, Babuska, and Schwab [1995] have made fundamental contributions to the
understanding of locking effects. The following general framework covers nearly
incompressible material and applies to the treatment of the Mindlin-Reissner plate
in §6.
Let X be a Hilbert space, a 0 : X × X → R
a continuous, symmetric, coercive
2 , and B : X L 2 () a continuous linear
mapping. Generally, B has a nontrivial kernel and dim ker B =∞ . In addition,
let t be a parameter 0 <t
bilinear form with a 0 (v, v) α 0 v
1 . Given X , we seek a solution u :
= u t X of
the equation
1
t 2 (Bu t ,Bv) 0 , =
a 0 (u t ,v)
+
, v
for all v
X.
( 3 . 42 )
The existence and uniqueness are guaranteed by the coercivity of a(u, v) :
=
a 0 (u, v) + t 2 (Bu, Bv) 0 , .
Suppose there exists u 0 X with
Bu 0 =
0 ,d :
= , u 0 > 0 .
( 3 . 43 )
After multiplying u 0 by a suitable factor, we can assume that a 0 (u 0 ,u 0 ) , u 0
.
In particular, the energy of the minimal solution satisfies
2 a 0 (u 0 ,u 0 ) +
0 , , u 0 ≤−
1
1
t 2 Bu 0
1
2 d
2
(u t ) (u 0 ) =
1
with a bound that is independent of t . Thus,
, u t ≥− (u t )
2 d , and so
u t 1 1
2 d
for all t> 0
( 3 . 44 )
is bounded below, where
X .
We now consider the solution of the variational problem in the finite element
space X h X . Looking at the results of Babuska and Suri [1992] or Braess [1998],
we recognize that the locking effect occurs when X h
:
=
and 19
ker B ={
0
}
Bv h 0 , C(h) v h X
for all v h X h .
( 3 . 45 )
19 To be precise, we have to exclude functions from X h which are polynomials in
or belong to the low-dimensional kernel. This is why on the right-hand side of (3.45) we
should replace
v h X by a norm of a quotient space as in (3.47).
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search