Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
u
,k,
1
•
•
u
,k,
2
•
u
,k,
2
•
u
Fig. 53.
The coarse-grid correction as an orthogonal projection
In addition, it follows from the orthogonality and (3.5) that
u
,k,
2
2
=
u
,k,
2
2
+
u
,k,
2
−
u
,k,
2
2
−
u
−
u
+
ρ
2
µ
≤
u
,k,
2
2
u
,k,
1
−
u
,k,
2
2
−
u
−
1
−
ρ
2
µ
+
ρ
2
µ
1
)
u
,k,
2
2
u
,k,
1
2
.
=
(
1
−
u
−
u
3
.
8
)
−
−
1
Now we make use of our knowledge of the two-grid rate. By (3.2),
−
ρ
2
µ
1
)ρ
1
+
ρ
2
µ
u
,k,
2
2
u
,k
2
.
−
u
≤
[
(
1
1
]
−
u
−
−
Thus, (3.1) holds with a rate which can be estimated by (3.9).
3.3 A Recurrence Formula.
The multigrid method with µ
=
1
for the V-cycle
and µ
=
2
for the W-cycle satisfies
ρ
2
µ
ρ
2
ρ
1
+
ρ
1
)
≤
1
(
1
−
(
3
.
9
)
−
at level
≥
2
with respect to the energy norm.
1
3.4 Theorem.
If the two-grid rate with respect to the energy norm satisfies ρ
1
≤
2
,
then
6
5
ρ
1
≤
ρ
≤
0
.
6
,
for
=
2
,
3
,...
(
3
.
10
)
for the W-cycle.
Proof.
For
=
1 there is nothing to prove. By the assertion for
−
1, it follows
from the recurrence formula (3.9) that
≤
ρ
1
+
(
6
+
(
6
ρ
2
5
ρ
1
)
4
(
1
−
ρ
1
)
=
ρ
1
{
5
)
4
[
ρ
1
(
1
−
ρ
1
)
]
1
}
+
(
6
1
4
3
4
}≤
36
≤
ρ
1
{
5
)
4
25
ρ
1
≤
1
0
.
36
.
Taking the square root, we get the desired result.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search