Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
7. Scown CD, Nazaroff WW, Mishra U, Strogen B, Lobscheid AB, Masanet E,
et al. Corrigendum: lifecycle greenhouse has implication of US national scenarios for cellu-
losic ethanol production. Environ Res Lett. 2012;7:014011.
8. Hsu DD, Inman D, Heath GA, Wolfrum EJ, Mann MK, Aden A. Life cycle environmental
impacts of selected U.S. ethanol production and use pathways in 2022. Environ Sci Technology.
2010;44:5289-97.
9. Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin K. Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from
switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;105(2):464-69.
10. Wang MQ, Han J, Haq Z, Tyner WE, Wu M, Elgowainy A. Energy and greenhouse gas
emission effects of corn and cellulosic ethanol with technology improvements and land use
changes. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35(5):1885-96.
11. Himmel M, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Foust TD. Biomass recalcitrance:
engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science. 2007;315:804-7.
12. FitzPatrick M, Champagne P, Cunningham MF, Whitney RA. A biorefinery processing
perspective: treatment of lignocellulosic materials for the production of value-added products.
Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(23):8915-22.
13. Liu ZS, Wu XL, Kida K, Tang YQ. Corn stover saccharification with concentrated sulfuric
acid: effects of saccharification conditions on sugar recovery and by-product generation.
Bioresour Technol. 2012;119:224-33.
14. Chen Y, Stevens MA, Zhu Y, Holmes J, Maxley G, Xu H. Reducing acid in dilute acid
pretreatment and the impact on enzymatic saccharification. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol.
2012;39(5):691-700.
15. Wright J. Fuel ethanol technology evaluation. Biofuels and municipal waste technology
research program summary FY 1986 National Technical
Information Service report
DE87001140. Solar Energy Research Institute DOE/CH/1093-6.
16. Sheehan J, Riley C. Annual bioethanol outlook: FY 2001. National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (NREL). Sponsored by Office of Fuels Development U.S. Department of Energy.
17. Humbird D. Biochemical Platform State of Technology Update. National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (NREL) September 2011. Milestone: A.ML.12; 2011.
18. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, et al. Features of promising
technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2005;96:673-86.
19. Rana D, Ran V, Ahring B. Producing high sugar concentrations form loblolly pine using wet
explosion pretreatment. Bioresour Technol. 2012;121:61-7.
20. Kazi FK, Fortman JA, Anex RP, Hsu DD, Aden A, Dutta A, Kothandaraman G. Techno-
economic comparison of process technologies for biochemical ethanol production from corn
stover. Fuel. 2010;89(1):S20-8.
21. Stephan JD, Mabee WE, Saddler JN. Will second-generation ethanol be able to compete with
first-generation ethanol? Opportunities for cost reduction. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin-Biofpr.
2012;6(2):159-76.
22. Huffer S, Roche CM, Blanch HW, Clark DS.
Escherichia coli
for biofuel production: bridging
the gap from promise to practice. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30(10):538-45.
23. Humbird D, Davis R, Tao L, Kinchin C, Hsu D, Aden A. Process design and economics for
biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol. 2011. NREL/TP-5100-47764.
24. Menon V, Rao M. Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: biofuels, platform chemicals and
biorefinery concept. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2012;38(4):522-50.
25. Knauf M, Moniruzzaman M. Lignocellulosic biomass processing: a perspective. Int Sugar
J. 2004;106(1263):147-50.
26. Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by
dehydration products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol.
2004;68(1):10-26.
27. Pienkos PT, Zhang M. Role of pretreatment and conditioning processes on toxicity of
lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates. Cellulose. 2009;16(4):743-62.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search