Native Grasses for Biomass Production at High Elevations - Industrial Crops: Breeding for BioEnergy and Bioproducts - page 131

116. Keske C, Hoag D, Brandess A, Johnson J. Is it economically feasible for farmers to grow their
own fuel? A study of Camelina sativa produced in the western United States as an on-farm
biofuel. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2013;54:89-99.
117. Bourgeon JM, Tr´guer D. Killing two birds with one stone: US and EU biofuel programmes.
Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2010;37(3):369-94.
118. Schubert C. Can biofuels finally take center stage? Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:777-84.
119. Chen X, Khanna M, ¨ nal H. The Economic Potential of Second-Generation Biofuels:
Implications for Social Welfare, Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Illinois.
Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Associ-
ation 2009. AAEA&ACCI Joint Annual Meeting, Milwaukee, July 26-26, 2009
120. Keske CMH, Brandess A, Hoag D, Pearson C. The economic feasibility of bio-butanol on
marginal lands in western Colorado poster presentation at the Agricultural and Applied
Economics Association (AAEA) meetings, August 13, 2012. Seattle. Refereed poster avail-
able on-line: 2012. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/124047/1/AAEA%20POSTER%
20664%20UPDATED.pdf . Accessed 25 Feb 2013.
121. Pearson CH, Keske, C, Follett R, Halvorson A, Larson S, Brandess A. Developing low-input,
high-biomass, Perennial cropping systems for advanced biofuels in the Intermountain West.
http://sungrant.tennessee.edu/NatConference/ConferenceProceedings/ENERGY+CROP
+PRODUCTION.htm . Accessed 21 Feb 2013. 2012.
122. Davis G, Tilton J. The resource curse. Natural Resources Forum. 2005;29:233-42.
123. Loomis JB, Keske CMH. Did the great recession reduce visitor spending and willingness to
pay for nature-based recreation? Evidence from 2006 and 2009. Contemp Econ Policy.
2012;30(2):238-46.
124. Keske CMH, Evans S, Iverson T. Total cost electricity pricing: a market solution for
increasingly rigorous environmental standards. Electricity J. 2012;25(2):7-15.
125. Alley T. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Natural gas asset decisions: It's more than
just price; 10/1/2012. http://www.power-eng.com/articles/print/volume-116/issue-10/depart
ments/gas-generation/natural-gas-asset-decisions-just-price.html . Accessed 25 Feb 2013
126. Mays GT, Belles RJ, Blevins BR, Hadley SW, Harrison TJ, JochemWC, et al. Application of
Spatial Data Modeling and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) for Identification of
Potential Siting Options for Various Electrical Generation Sources. Reactor and Nuclear
Systems Division, Computational Sciences & Engineering Division, and Energy & Trans-
portation Science Division. Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI); 2011.
ORNL/TM-2011/157.
127. McLaughlin SB, Walsh ME. Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herba-
ceous crops for bioenergy. Biomass Bioenerg. 1998;14(4):317-24.
128. Lubowski RM, et al. Major uses of land in the United States, 2002. Washington, DC: USDA-
Economic Research Service; 2006. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-
economic-information-bulletin/eib14.aspx .
129. Williams PRD, Winman D, Aden A, Heath GA. Environmental and sustainability factors
associated with next-generation biofuels in the U.S.: What do we really know? Environ Sci
Technol. 2009;43(13):4763-75.
130. McLaughlin SB, Del La Torre Ugarte DG, Garten Jr CT, Lynd LR, Sanderson MA, Tolbert
VR. High-value renewable energy from prairie grasses. Environ Sci Technol.

2002;36:2122-9.
131. Cross JE, Keske CM, Lacy MG, Hoag DLK, Bastian CT. Adoption of conservation ease-
ments among agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming: the role of economic
dependence and sense of place. Landscape Urban Plan. 2011;101(1):75-83.