Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
s equation for diluted suspensions (Eq. 5.2 ).
According to Odenbach [ 18 ], for ferro
Let us focus now on Einstein
'
ϕ V should account
not only for the particles including their surfactant, but also the excess surfactant,
which is often used to stabilize the
fl
uids, the volume fraction
fl
uid. However, as he states further, it is suf-
cient to use the volume fraction of the particles including their surfactant layer for
all practical applications. For this case, the volume fraction
ϕ VFF can be calculated
as follows [ 18 ]:
3
þ
d
2s
/ VFF ¼ / V
ð 5 : 21 Þ
d
where d denotes the diameter of the magnetic particles, and s represents the
thickness of the surfactant layer. As reported by Odenbach [ 18 ], only few efforts
have been made to determine the real value of s in given samples of ferro
uids with
higher precision. The error resulting from a lack of knowledge about the thickness
of the surfactant layer can therefore be larger than that from neglecting the excess
surfactant. Since for higher concentrations one also has to consider the interparticle
relation, Einstein
fl
s equation (Eq. 5.2 ) will not be an appropriate choice any more
for volume fractions of solid particles above 10 %.
For the application of ferro
'
fl
uids, Rosensweig [ 7 ] proposed a modi
ed Batch-
'
'
elor
s equation (Eq. 5.11). For this he assumed that the suspension
s viscosity
ϕ max of suspended material:
should diverge for a certain critical volume fraction
!
2
/ VFF
/ max
g eff ¼ g L 1
2
:
5 / VFF þ
ð
2
:
5 / max
1
Þ
ð 5 : 22 Þ
where ϕ max represents the maximum volume (packing) fraction, which Rosensweig
[ 7 ] estimated to be 0.74. Note that this is a rather high value, especially if the
packing is random or if clustering of the magnetic particles appears. On the other
hand, suspended particles with different sizes can lead to high packing fraction.
Table 5.3 shows some examples of packing fractions for monodispersed particles.
When the ferro
ow, the magnetic particles
will tend to rotate. This is due to the torque produced by the viscous forces. Under
fl
uid is under the in
fl
uence of a shear
fl
Table 5.3 The maximum packing fraction of various arrangements of monodispersed particles
[ 188 ]
Arrangement
Maximum packing fraction ϕ max
Simple cube
0.52
Maximum thermodynamically stable con guration
0.548
Hexagonally packed sheets just touching
0.605
Random close packing
0.637
Face-centred cubic/hexagonal close packed
0.68
Body-centred cubic/hexagonal close packed
0.74
Search WWH ::




Custom Search