Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
table 7.1
land-use unit (luu) Indicators Identified through multiple
correspondence analysis as showing Important temporal trends between
January 1999 and January 2000
attribute
category
Indicator
level
1999 (%)
2000 (%)
p a
Biophysical
efficiency
Technical
Bean yield per acre
H
32 (14.22)
5 (2.22)
< .001
L
33 (14.67)
55 (24.44)
= .01
Kale yield per acre
H
30 (13.33)
0 (0.00)
< .001
L
31 (13.78)
120 (53.33)
< .001
Maize yield per acre
H
47 (20.89)
6 (2.67)
< .001
L
50 (22.22)
75 (33.33)
= .01
Potato yield per acre
H
43 (19.11)
2 (0.89)
< .001
Farm
efficiency
Inputs
Income/inputs for
food crops
E
124 (55.11)
0 (0.00)
< .001
L
51 (22.67)
93 (41.33)
< .001
Income/inputs for
livestock
H
39 (17.33)
101 (44.89)
< .001
L
40 (17.78)
79 (35.11)
< .001
Outputs
Income per acre of
food crop
E
125 (55.56)
0 (0.00)
< .001
L
51 (22.67)
169 (75.11)
< .001
Profitability
Profitability
E
56 (24.89)
0 (0.00)
< .001
Income
Amount
Average wage
H
33 (14.67)
99 (44.00)
< .001
L
42 (18.67)
46 (20.44)
= .63
Per capita farm
income
E
18 (8.00)
0 (0.00)
< .001
Pests,
diseases,
and health
Human
diseases
Hospital visits/
person/month
H
33 (14.67)
151 (67.11)
< .001
Hospitalizations/
person/year
H
17 (7.56)
75 (33.33)
< .001
L
26 (11.56)
7 (3.11)
< .001
Preferences
Food
Proportion of
traditional foods
eaten
H
37 (16.44)
145 (64.44)
< .001
H, high; L, low; E, missing
Probability for Ho: Proportion of LUU in 1999 = Proportion of LUU in 2000 against Ha: Proportion of
LUU in 1999 ≥ = Proportion of LUU in 2000
measurement and the recognition by them that this was useful information. Because
of this, many of the farmers who had not been able to provide estimates on yields
of various indicator crops were able to do so in the subsequent round of measure-
ments, while those who had been unwilling to provide income-related information
were willing to do so. With further measurements, it would be possible to assess the
impact of these on the accuracy of the measurements. In addition, other methods of
collecting data on the indicators should be explored to minimize the cost and the
interviewer biases inherent in the methods used in this study.
The possibility of an overall reduction in the technical biophysical efficiency
of most LUUs between the first and the second measurements is indicated by the
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search