Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
use of the health language is crucial in helping the communities to build a concep-
tual framework of the indicator selection process and the measurement and assess-
ment processes. Presenting the agroecosystem as an individual whose health status
is unknown, indicators are defined as those measures that need to be taken to make
a statement on the health status on such an individual.
The results of this process demonstrate that agroecosystem health and sustain-
ability can be used as part of a community's decision support system. Communities
created action plans and revised and implemented them based on the information
derived from indicators. The process of indicator selection and measurement in itself
appeared to enhance collective action, while sensitizing communities to the underly-
ing biophysical and socioeconomic processes that had an impact on the health and
sustainability of their agroecosystem. Some practical improvements to the process
include the use of geographical information systems to enhance the quality and cost-
effectiveness of indicator measurement, development of self-reporting systems, and
automation of some reporting and feedback processes, which would increase the
cost-effectiveness of the overall process.
RefeRences
Ayres, R.U. (1996). Statistical measures of unsustainability. Ecological Economics 16:
239-255.
Boyle, M., Kay, J.J., and Pond B., 2000. Monitoring in support of policy: An adaptive ecosys-
tem approach. In Encyclopaedia of Global Environmental Change . Munn, R., ed. New
York: Wiley, pp. 116-137.
Cairns, J., Jr., McCormick, P., and Niedrelehner, B.R. (1993). A proposed framework for
developing indicators of ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia 263: 1-44.
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). (1996). A Framework for Devel-
oping Ecosystem Health Goals, Objectives and Indicators: Tools for Ecosystem-Based
Management . Manitoba Statutory Publications, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, p. 24.
Casley, D.J., and Lury, D.A. (1982). Monitoring and Evaluation of Agricultural and Rural
Development Projects. John Hopkins University Press, London. 145 pp.
Dumanski, J. (1994). A Framework for Evaluation of Sustainable Land Management
(FESLM) . Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa.
Gallopin, G.C. (1994a). Agroecosystem health: A guiding concept for agricultural research?
In Agroecosystem Health with Special Reference to the Consultative Group for Inter-
national Research (CGIAR): Proceedings of an International Workshop . Nielsen, N.O.,
ed. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: Agroecosystem Health Project, Faculty of Environmen-
tal Sciences, University of Guelph, pp. 94-97.
Gosselin, P., Belanger, D., Bibeault, J.F., and Webster, A. (1991). Feasibilit y St u dy on the Devel-
opment of Indicators for a Sustainable Society . Health and Welfare Canada, Quebec.
Harrington, L.W. (1992). Measuring sustainability: Issues and alternatives. In Let Farm-
ers Judge: Experiences in Assessing the Sustainability of Agriculture . Hiemstra, W.,
Reijntjes, C., and van der Werf, E., eds. London: Intermediate Technology, pp. 26-41.
Izac, A.-M.N., and Swift, M.J. (1994). On agricultural sustainability and its measurement in
small-scale farming in sub-Saharan Africa. Ecological Economics 11: 105-125.
Kay, J.J. (1993). On the nature of ecological integrity: some closing comments. In Ecological
Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems . Woodley, S., Kay, J., and Francis, G.,
eds. Delray, FL: St. Lucie Press, pp. 210-212.
Lightfoot, C., and Noble, R.P. (1993). A participatory experiment in sustainable agriculture.
Journal of Farming Systems Research Extension 4(1): 11-34.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search