Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
Participatory workshops
Multidisciplinary
team
Descriptions of the
agroecosystems
Potential indicators
Agroecosystem problems,
concerns, goals and
objectives
Initial list of
potential
indicators
Researcher-proposed
indicators
Community-driven
indicators
Selection
criteria
Measurement
Correspondence
analysis
Measurement
Evaluation
Refined list of
researcher-proposed
indicators
Integrated
assessment
Key
Italics = Community-drive process; Normal = Predominantly research-drive process
Bold = Participatory process
fIGuRe 6.1 Flowchart showing the approaches in which indicators of agroecosystem
health and sustainability were developed.
6.2.1 D e v e l of p m e n t of f C o m m u n i t y -D r i v e n i n D i C A t of r s
The rationale for developing community-driven indicators was that communities
must assess their own agroecosystems for the process to be sustainable. However,
indicators selected by researchers may not be practical for use by the communities.
Communities in the six intensive study sites were facilitated to develop a suite of
indicators that they would use to monitor the health and sustainability of their agro-
ecosystems. These indicators were developed in 3-day workshops held in each of the
six intensive villages in July to August 1998. Gender- and age-specific focus group
discussions were used in conjunction with pairwise ranking and trend analysis to
identify health attributes of most concern to the residents, list potential indicators,
and then refine the list to a parsimonious suite. The sequence of participatory tools
Search WWH ::




Custom Search