Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
table 4.10 (continued)
Impacts of thiririka community's Goals based on Geometric analysis
community Goals
Ver tex
15 (Employment)
.
.
+
.
+
+
+
+
+
+
16 (Firewood)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
17 (Forest)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
18 (Logging)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
19 (Co-op)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
+
+
+
+
20 (Seed)
.
.
.
.
.
+
.
.
.
.
.
21 (Soil)
.
.
.
.
.
.
+
.
.
.
.
22 (Frost)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
23 (Unity)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
+
+
+
+
24 (Leadership)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
+
+
+
+
25 (Grabbing)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
+
+
+
+
26 (Knowledge)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
+
+
+
+
27 (Relationships)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
28 (Market)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
+
+
+
+
29 (History)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
30 (Extension)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
+
31 (Go-downs)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
tot als
+
99
5
5
1
9
6
8
8
14
14
14
15
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pro blem ranking
2
1
8
10
2
4
9
5
7
3
6
Goa l status
1
3
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
2
2
+ Positive impact; − n egative impact; ± ambivalent; . no impact; # indeterminate
total degrees of 8, 7, and 7, respectively. Nine of the vertices (1, 8, 12, 20, 21, 22, 29,
30, and 31) are sources, and none is a sink.
The impacts of community goals based on a geometric analysis are shown in
Table 4.10. Reduction in agrochemical usage results in negative impacts on vertices
7 and 11; ambivalent impacts on vertices 3, 4, 5, and 6; and indeterminate impacts on
vertex 9. The ambivalent and indeterminate impacts of agrochemical use result from
path imbalance from vertex 10 to vertex 9. The positive impacts of community goals
increase to 107 when the sign of arc [10, 11] is inverted and to 104 if it is removed.
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search