Cryptography Reference
In-Depth Information
see the figure below.
−Θ+
d
−Θ− d
Θ+
d
Θ
d
Θ−
d
..
Θ−
d
Θ+
d
−Θ−
d
−Θ+
d
Fig. 2. The intersection of A and B with E
Since the coecient of M associated with ( r, s )in A is m r−θ ,andthecoe-
cient associated with ( r, s )in B is m r , we know that m r =0forevery r in the
union, (( π 1 ( A
π 1 ( B
E )
θ )
E )), where:
π 1 ( A
E )
θ =[ d +1 ,
2 θ
2 θ + d +1 ,
θ
θ + d +1 ,n
1] .
(18)
1]
[
1]
[
Notice that π 1 ( B
E )and π 1 ( A
θ are symmetric with respect to
[ d +1 ,n− 1], and therefore their union is [ d +1 ,n− 1] if and only if the first
“gap”, [ θ, θ + d ], of π 1 ( B
E )
E ) is contained in the first or second subinterval of
π 1 ( A
E )
θ . This occurs when either θ + d
n
2 θ
1, which is equivalent
to 3 θ + d<n ,or n
2 θ + d +1
θ , which is equivalent to n< 3 θ
d ;thus,
since by hypothesis
1].
Furthermore, since the boundary of E , ∂E , corresponds to regions at which the
coecient of the right side of (12) is a single λ if ,wecanusethecomplementary
technique, checking the coecients corresponding to ∂E
|
n
3 θ
|
>d ,wehave m r =0forall r
[ d +1 ,n
( A
B
C
D ), to
reveal that λ if =0for if
1].
Moreover, we can compare coecients at the intersection of ∂E and one of A ,
B , C ,or D .For ∂E
[ d +1
1]
[ θ +1 ,n
θ
1]
[ n
θ +1 ,n
d
A , we get the relations λ if
= m d + if
for if
[1 ,d
1],
B ,weget λ if = m if for if
and for ∂E
1]. Since we have already
shown that such coecients of M are zero, λ can only be nonzero for the values
λ 0 , λ d , λ θ , λ n−θ ,and λ n−d .
Using this information we can greatly simplify (13), and as a consequence, get
further information about the coecients of M . In particular, from collecting
coecients for monomials with indices ( θ, i ), for if
[ n
d +1 ,n
[0 ,d ], we get the relations
m q 0 + m if = λ 0 + λ −d .Thus, m if = m 0 for if
d , and, finally, we see that
M = m 0 π .
The preceding theorem gives us precise criteria for when the space of linear
maps, S G , consists of only projected multiplication maps. Furthermore, it was
stated in [10] and [15] that these multiplication maps satisfy the relation (2)
only if the multiplication commutes with the projection, which happens precisely
Search WWH ::




Custom Search