Cryptography Reference
In-Depth Information
Then
div(
y
+
V
)=
j
d
j
([(
a
j
, −b
j
)]
−
[
∞
]) =
j
d
j
([
w
(
a
j
,b
j
)]
−
[
∞
])
.
Since
div(
f −V
2
)=div(
y
+
V
)+div(
y−V
)=
j
d
j
([(
a
j
,b
j
)]+[(
a
j
, −b
j
)]
−
2[
∞
])
,
V
2
=
j
(
x
a
j
)
d
j
, by part (a). Therefore, every root of
we must have
f
−
−
V
2
yields a term in div(
y
f
−
−
V
). This completes the proof.
Part (a) of the proposition has a converse. If
D
=
c
j
[
P
j
] is a divisor, let
w
(
D
)=
c
j
[
w
(
P
j
)].
PROPOSITION 13.3
Let
D
be a divisor of degree 0. T hen
D
+
w
(
D
)
isaprincipaldivisor; infact,
itisthe divisor of a rationalfunction in
x
.
Write
D
=
j
c
j
[
P
j
], where possibly some
P
j
is
∞
.Sincedeg
D
=
PROOF
0, we have
j
c
j
=0,so
D
=
j
c
j
([
P
j
]
−
[
∞
]). If some
P
j
=
∞
,that
term can now be omitted, so we may assume
P
j
=
∞
for all
j
. Therefore,
D
+
w
(
D
)=
j
c
j
([
P
j
]+[
w
(
P
j
)]
−
2[
∞
]), which is the divisor of a polynomial
in
x
, by Proposition 13.2.
A divisor of the form
D
=
j
c
j
([
P
j
]
−
[
∞
]), with
P
j
=(
a
j
,b
j
), is called
semi-reduced
if the following hold:
1.
c
j
≥
0 for all
j
2. if
b
j
=0,then
c
j
=0or1
3. if [
P
j
]with
b
j
= 0 occurs in the sum (that is,
c
j
>
0), then [
w
(
P
j
)] does
not occur.
If, in addition,
j
c
j
≤ g
,then
D
is called
reduced
.
Proposition 13.2 implies that div (
y − V
(
x
)) is semi-reduced for every poly-
nomial
V
(
x
).
Let
D
1
=
j
c
j
([
P
j
]
−
[
∞
]) and
D
2
=
j
d
j
([
P
j
]
−
[
∞
]) be two divisors
with
c
j
≥
0and
d
j
≥
0. Define
gcd(
D
1
,D
2
)=
j
min
{
c
j
,d
j
}
([
P
j
]
−
[
∞
])
.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search