Cryptography Reference
In-Depth Information
PROOF
As in the proof of Lemma 9.28, we see that
f
2
n
+1
f
n
+1
f
n
since the two sides have the same divisors and their expansions at 0 have the
same leading coecient. Since
℘
((
n
+1)
z
)
−
℘
(
nz
)=
−
℘
((
n
+1)
z
)
− ℘
(
nz
)=(
℘
((
n
+1)
z
)
− ℘
(
z
))
−
(
℘
(
nz
)
− ℘
(
z
))
f
n
+2
f
n
f
n
+1
+
f
n
+1
f
n
−
1
f
n
=
−
,
the result follows by equating the two expressions for
℘
((
n
+1)
z
)
−
℘
(
nz
).
LEMMA 9.30
℘
f
2
n
=(
f
n
)(
f
n
+2
f
n−
1
− f
n−
2
f
n
+1
)
.
PROOF
As in the proofs of the previous two lemmas, we have
℘
f
2
n
f
n−
1
f
n
+1
.
(A little care is needed to handle the points
ω
j
/
2.) Since
℘
((
n
+1)
z
)
− ℘
((
n −
1)
z
)=
−
℘
((
n
+1)
z
)
− ℘
((
n −
1)
z
)=(
℘
((
n
+1)
z
)
− ℘
(
z
))
−
(
℘
((
n −
1)
z
)
− ℘
(
z
))
f
n
+2
f
n
f
n
+1
+
f
n
f
n
−
2
f
n−
1
=
−
,
the result follows.
LEMMA 9.31
For all
n ≥
1
,
f
n
(
z
)=
ψ
n
℘
(
z
)
,
2
℘
(
z
)
1
where
ψ
n
is defined inSection 3.2.
PROOF
Since
ψ
1
=1and
ψ
2
=2
y
, the lemma is easily seen to be true for
n
=1
,
2. From Equations (9.10) and (9.8) in Section 9.2, we have
f
3
(
℘
)
2
f
3
f
2
−
=
−
=
℘
(2
z
)
− ℘
(
z
)
(9.25)
℘
(
z
)
℘
(
z
)
2
1
4
−
2
℘
(
z
)
− ℘
(
z
)
=
3
℘
4
3
2
g
2
℘
2
16
g
2
1
−
−
3
g
3
℘
−
=
−
.
(
℘
)
2
Search WWH ::
Custom Search