Cryptography Reference
In-Depth Information
PROOF
When
|
z
|
<
|
ω
|
,
= ω 2
(1 ( z/ω )) 2 1
= ω 2
1
( z − ω ) 2
1
ω 2
1
.
( n +1) z n
ω n
n =1
Therefore,
z 2 +
ω
z n
ω n +2 .
( z )= 1
( n +1)
=0
n =1
Summing over ω first, then over n , yields the result.
THEOREM 9.8
Let ( z ) be the W eierstra ss -function for a lattice L .Then
( z ) 2 =4 ( z ) 3
60 G 4 ( z )
140 G 6 .
PROOF
From Proposition 9.7,
( z )= z 2 +3 G 4 z 2 +5 G 6 z 4 + ···
( z )= 2 z 3 +6 G 4 z +20 G 6 z 3 + ··· .
Cubing and squaring these two relations yields
( z ) 3 = z 6 +9 G 4 z 2 +15 G 6 + ···
( z ) 2 =4 z 6
24 G 4 z 2
80 G 6 + ··· .
Therefore,
f ( z )= ( z ) 2
4 ( z ) 3 +60 G 4 ( z ) + 140 G 6 = c 1 z + c 2 z 2 +
···
is a power series with no constant term and with no negative powers of z .
But the only possible poles of f ( z ) are at the poles of ( z )and ( z ), namely,
the elements of L .Since f ( z ) is doubly periodic and, as we have just shown,
hasnopoleat0, f ( z ) has no poles. By Theorem 9.1, f ( z ) is constant. Since
the power series for f ( z ) has no constant term, f (0) = 0. Therefore, f ( z )is
identically 0.
It is customary to set
g 2 =60 G 4
g 3 = 140 G 6 .
Search WWH ::




Custom Search