Cryptography Reference
In-Depth Information
PROOF
When
|
z
|
<
|
ω
|
,
=
ω
−
2
(1
−
(
z/ω
))
2
−
1
=
ω
−
2
∞
1
(
z − ω
)
2
−
1
ω
2
1
.
(
n
+1)
z
n
ω
n
n
=1
Therefore,
z
2
+
ω
∞
z
n
ω
n
+2
.
℘
(
z
)=
1
(
n
+1)
=0
n
=1
Summing over
ω
first, then over
n
, yields the result.
THEOREM 9.8
Let
℘
(
z
)
be the W eierstra ss
℘
-function for a lattice
L
.Then
℘
(
z
)
2
=4
℘
(
z
)
3
−
60
G
4
℘
(
z
)
−
140
G
6
.
PROOF
From Proposition 9.7,
℘
(
z
)=
z
−
2
+3
G
4
z
2
+5
G
6
z
4
+
···
℘
(
z
)=
−
2
z
−
3
+6
G
4
z
+20
G
6
z
3
+
··· .
Cubing and squaring these two relations yields
℘
(
z
)
3
=
z
−
6
+9
G
4
z
−
2
+15
G
6
+
···
℘
(
z
)
2
=4
z
−
6
−
24
G
4
z
−
2
−
80
G
6
+
··· .
Therefore,
f
(
z
)=
℘
(
z
)
2
4
℘
(
z
)
3
+60
G
4
℘
(
z
) + 140
G
6
=
c
1
z
+
c
2
z
2
+
−
···
is a power series with no constant term and with no negative powers of
z
.
But the only possible poles of
f
(
z
) are at the poles of
℘
(
z
)and
℘
(
z
), namely,
the elements of
L
.Since
f
(
z
) is doubly periodic and, as we have just shown,
hasnopoleat0,
f
(
z
) has no poles. By Theorem 9.1,
f
(
z
) is constant. Since
the power series for
f
(
z
) has no constant term,
f
(0) = 0. Therefore,
f
(
z
)is
identically 0.
It is customary to set
g
2
=60
G
4
g
3
= 140
G
6
.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search