Cryptography Reference
In-Depth Information
problem if
w
lies on a side of
F
. Suppose
w
=
xω
1
with 0
<x<
1. Then
ω
3
−
w
=(1
−
x
)
ω
1
+
ω
2
∈
F
.
In this case, we translate by
ω
2
to get
(1
x
)
ω
1
,and
again the two elements of the pair are distinct. The case
w
=
xω
2
is handled
similarly.
For a fixed
w
, the function
℘
(
z
)
− ℘
(
w
) has zeros at
z
=
w
and
z
=
ω
3
− w
.
By Theorem 9.1(5), these are the only two zeros in
F
and they are simple
zeros. Therefore, the function
h
(
z
)=
(
w, ω
3
−
−
x
)
ω
1
∈
F
.Since
w
=
ω
1
/
2, we have
x
=1
/
2, hence
xω
1
=(1
−
℘
(
w
))
ord
w
f
(
℘
(
z
)
−
w
)
(the product is over pairs (
w, ω
3
− w
)) has a zero of order ord
w
f
at
w
and
at
ω
3
− w
when ord
w
f>
0andhasapoleofthesameorderas
f
when
ord
w
f<
0. Since
ord
w
f
= 0 by Theorem 9.1, the poles at
z ∈ L
of the
factors in the product cancel. Therefore,
f
(
z
)
/h
(
z
) has no zeros or poles in
F
.
By Theorem 9.1(1),
f
(
z
)
/h
(
z
) is constant. Since
h
(
z
) is a rational function
of
℘
(
z
), so is
f
(
z
). This completes the proof of Theorem 9.3.
In order to construct functions with prescribed properties, it is convenient
to introduce the Weierstrass
σ
-function. It is not doubly periodic, but it
satisfies a simple transformation law for translation by elements of
L
.
PROPOSITION 9.5
Let
1
ω
e
(
z/w
)+
2
(
z/w
)
2
.
σ
(
z
)=
σ
(
z
;
L
)=
z
ω∈L
ω
z
−
=0
Then
1.
σ
(
z
)
isanalyticfor all
z ∈
C
2.
σ
(
z
)
has simp e zeros at each
ω ∈ L
and has no other zeros
d
2
dz
2
log
σ
(
z
)=
−
℘
(
z
)
3.
4. given
ω
∈
L
,there exist
a
=
a
ω
and
b
=
b
ω
su ch that
σ
(
z
+
ω
)=
e
az
+
b
σ
(
z
)
for all
z ∈
C
.
PROOF
The exponential factor is included to make the product converge.
A short calculation yields the power series expansion
(1
− u
)
e
u
+
2
u
2
=1+
c
3
u
3
+
c
4
u
4
+
··· .
Search WWH ::
Custom Search