Cryptography Reference
In-Depth Information
problem if w lies on a side of F . Suppose w = 1 with 0 <x< 1. Then
ω 3
w =(1
x ) ω 1 + ω 2
F .
In this case, we translate by ω 2 to get
(1
x ) ω 1 ,and
again the two elements of the pair are distinct. The case w = 2 is handled
similarly.
For a fixed w , the function ( z ) − ℘ ( w ) has zeros at z = w and z = ω 3 − w .
By Theorem 9.1(5), these are the only two zeros in F and they are simple
zeros. Therefore, the function
h ( z )=
( w, ω 3
x ) ω 1
F .Since w
= ω 1 / 2, we have x
=1 / 2, hence 1
=(1
( w )) ord w f
( ( z )
w )
(the product is over pairs ( w, ω 3 − w )) has a zero of order ord w f at w and
at ω 3 − w when ord w f> 0andhasapoleofthesameorderas f when
ord w f< 0. Since ord w f = 0 by Theorem 9.1, the poles at z ∈ L of the
factors in the product cancel. Therefore, f ( z ) /h ( z ) has no zeros or poles in F .
By Theorem 9.1(1), f ( z ) /h ( z ) is constant. Since h ( z ) is a rational function
of ( z ), so is f ( z ). This completes the proof of Theorem 9.3.
In order to construct functions with prescribed properties, it is convenient
to introduce the Weierstrass σ -function. It is not doubly periodic, but it
satisfies a simple transformation law for translation by elements of L .
PROPOSITION 9.5
Let
1
ω e ( z/w )+ 2 ( z/w ) 2 .
σ ( z )= σ ( z ; L )= z
ω∈L
ω
z
=0
Then
1. σ ( z ) isanalyticfor all z ∈ C
2. σ ( z ) has simp e zeros at each ω ∈ L and has no other zeros
d 2
dz 2 log σ ( z )=
( z )
3.
4. given ω
L ,there exist a = a ω and b = b ω su ch that
σ ( z + ω )= e az + b σ ( z )
for all z ∈ C .
PROOF The exponential factor is included to make the product converge.
A short calculation yields the power series expansion
(1 − u ) e u + 2 u 2 =1+ c 3 u 3 + c 4 u 4 + ··· .
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search