Cryptography Reference
In-Depth Information
The group
G
p
can be regarded as a subgroup of
G
. Recall that cocycles in
Z
(
G, E
[2]) are maps from
G
to
E
[2] with certain properties. Such maps may
be restricted to
G
p
to obtain elements of
Z
(
G
p
,E
[2]). A curve
C
a,b,c
yields an
element of
H
1
(
G, E
[
2]
). This yields an element of
H
1
(
G
p
,E
[2]) that becomes
trivial in
H
1
(
G
p
,E
(
Q
p
)) if and only if
C
a,b,c
has a
p
-adic point.
In Section 8.7, we defined
S
2
to be those triples (
a, b, c
) such that
C
a,b,c
has a
p
-adic point for all
p ≤∞
. This means that
S
2
is the set of triples
(
a, b, c
) such that th
e c
orresponding cohomology class in
H
1
(
G, E
[2]) becomes
trivial in
H
1
(
G
p
,E
(
Q
p
)) for all
p
.Moreover,
2
is
S
2
modulo those
triples coming from points in
E
(
Q
). All of this can be expressed in terms
of cohomology. We can also replace 2 by an arbitrary
n
≤∞
≥
1. Define the
Shafarevich-Tate group
to be
⎛
⎞
⎝
H
1
(
G, E
(
Q
))
→
⎠
H
1
(
G
p
,E
(
Q
p
))
=Ker
p
≤∞
and define the
n
-Selmer group
to be
⎛
⎞
⎝
H
1
(
G
p
,E
[
n
])
⎠
.
H
1
(
G
p
,E
(
Q
p
))
S
n
=Ker
→
p
≤∞
The Shafarevich-Tate group can be thought of as consisting of equivalence
classes of pairs (
C, φ
) such that
C
has a
p
-adic point for all
p ≤∞
.This
group is nontrivial if there exists such a
C
that has no rational points. In
Section 8.8, we gave an example of such a curve. The
n
-Selmer group
S
n
can
be regarded as the generalization to
n
-descents of the curves
C
a,b,c
that arise
in 2-descents. It is straightforward to use the definitions to deduce the basic
descent sequence
0
→
E
(
Q
)
/nE
(
Q
)
→
S
n
→
[
n
]
→
0
,
where [
n
]isthe
n
-torsion in . When one is doing descent, the goal is to
obtain information about
E
(
Q
)
/nE
(
Q
). However, the calculations take place
in
S
n
. The group
[
n
] is the obstruction to transferring information back to
E
(
Q
)
/nE
(
Q
).
The group
S
n
depends on
n
. It is finite (we proved this in the case where
n
=
2and
E
[2]
E
(
Q
)). The group is independent of
n
.Its
n
-torsion [
n
]is
finite since it is the quotient of the finite group
S
n
. It was conjectured by Tate
and Shafarevich in the early 1960s that is finite; this is still unproved in
general. The first examples where was proved finite were given by Rubin
in 1986 (for all CM curves over
Q
with analytic rank 0; see Section 14.2) and
by Kolyvagin in 1987 (for all elliptic curves over
Q
with analytic rank 0 or 1).
No other examples over
Q
are known.
⊆
Search WWH ::
Custom Search