Cryptography Reference
In-Depth Information
be points on
E
,where
y
i
∈
Q
and
a
i
,b
i
are integers with gcd(
a
i
,b
i
) = 1. Let
g
1
=2(
a
1
b
2
+
a
2
b
1
)(
Ab
1
b
2
+
a
1
a
2
)+4
Bb
1
b
2
g
2
=(
a
1
a
2
−
Ab
1
b
2
)
2
−
4
B
(
a
1
b
2
+
a
2
b
1
)
b
1
b
2
a
2
b
1
)
2
.
g
3
=(
a
1
b
2
−
Then a short calculation shows that
a
3
b
3
+
a
4
b
4
=
g
1
a
3
a
4
b
3
b
4
=
g
2
g
3
,
g
3
.
LEMMA 8.20
Let
c
1
,c
2
,d
1
,d
2
∈
Z
.Then
Max(
|c
1
|, |d
1
|
)
·
Max(
|c
2
|, |d
2
|
)
≤
2Max(
|c
1
c
2
|, |c
1
d
2
+
c
2
d
1
|, |d
1
d
2
|
)
.
PROOF
(other-
wise, switch
c
1
,d
1
). Let
L
denote the left side of the inequality of the lemma
and let
R
denote the right side. There are three cases to consider.
Without loss of generality, we may assume that
|
c
1
|≤|
d
1
|
1. If
|
c
2
|≤|
d
2
|
,then
L
=
|
d
1
d
2
|
and 2
|
d
1
d
2
|≤
R
,so
L
≤
R
.
2. If
|
c
2
|≥|
d
2
|≥
(1
/
2)
|
c
2
|
,then
L
=
|
d
1
c
2
|
and
R ≥
2
|d
1
d
2
|≥|d
1
c
2
|≥L.
3. If
|d
2
|≤
(1
/
2)
|c
2
|
,then
L
=
|d
1
c
2
|
and
R
≥
c
1
d
2
+
c
2
d
1
|
≥
2(
|c
2
d
1
|−|c
1
d
2
|
)
≥
2(
|c
2
d
1
|−|d
1
|
(1
/
2)
|c
2
|
)
=
|c
2
d
1
|
=
L.
2
|
This completes the proof of the lemma.
LEMMA 8.21
Let
c
1
,c
2
,d
1
,d
2
∈
Z
with
gcd(
c
i
,d
i
)=1
for
i
=1
,
2
.Then
gcd(
c
1
c
2
,c
1
d
2
+
c
2
d
1
,d
1
d
2
)=1
.
PROOF
Let
d
=gcd(
c
1
d
2
+
c
2
d
1
,d
1
d
2
). Suppose
p
is a prime such that
p|c
1
and
p|d
.Then
p
d
1
since gcd(
c
1
,d
1
) = 1. Since
p|d
1
d
2
,wehave
p|d
2
.
Therefore,
p
c
2
. Therefore,
p|c
1
d
2
and
p
c
2
d
1
,so
p
c
1
d
2
+
c
2
d
1
. Therefore
p
d
, contradiction. Similarly, there is no prime dividing both
c
2
and
d
.It
Search WWH ::
Custom Search