Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
sum over the i's in a single block. We have
X
( F n (U (i) ) 0 ) 2 X
i2I n
( F n (U (i) ) 0 ) 2
RSS( 0 )
=
i2I n
h f( F n (u) F(t 0 )) 2 ( F n (u) F(t 0 )) 2 g1fu 2 D n g i
= n 1=3 (P n P) h f(n 1=3 ( F n (u) F(t 0 ))) 2
(n 1=3 ( F n (u) F(t 0 ))) 2 g1fu 2 D n g i
= nP n
h f(n 1=3 ( F n (u) F(t 0 ))) 2
(n 1=3 ( F n (u) F(t 0 ))) 2 g1fu 2 D n g i
+ n 1=3 P
:
Empirical processes arguments show that the first term is o p (1) because the
random function that sits as the argument to n 1=3 (P n P) can be shown to
be eventually contained in a Donsker class of functions with arbitrarily high
preassigned probability. Hence, up to a o p (1) term,
= n 1=3 Z
f(n 1=3 ( F n (u) F(t 0 ))) 2 (n 1=3 ( F n (u) F(t 0 ))) 2 gdG(t)
RSS( 0 )
D n
= n 1=3 Z
f(n 1=3 ( F n (u) F(t 0 ))) 2 (n 1=3 ( F n (u) F(t 0 ))) 2 gg(t)dt
D n
Z
n
(n 1=3 ( F n (t 0 + hn 1=3 ) F(t 0 ))) 2
(n 1=3 ( F n (t 0 + hn 1=3 ) F(t 0 ))) 2 o g(t 0 + hn 1=3 )dh
=
n 1=3 (D n t 0 )
Z
(X n (h) Y n (h)) g(t 0 ) dh + o p (1) :
=
n 1=3 (D n t 0 )
Now, using Equation (3.5) along with the fact that the set n 1=3 (D n t 0 ) is
eventually contained in a compact set with arbitrarily high probability, we
conclude that
Z
f(g a;b (h)) 2 (g a;b (h)) 2 gdh:
RSS( 0 ) ! d g(t 0 )
There are some nuances involved in the above distributional convergence which
we skip. The next step is to invoke Brownian scaling to relate g a;b and g a;b to
the \canonical" slope-of-convex-minorant processes g 1;1 and g 1;1 and use this
to express the limit distribution above in terms of these canonical processes.
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search