Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
sum over the i's in a single block. We have
X
( F
n
(U
(i)
)
0
)
2
X
i2I
n
( F
n
(U
(i)
)
0
)
2
RSS(
0
)
=
i2I
n
h
f( F
n
(u) F(t
0
))
2
( F
n
(u) F(t
0
))
2
g1fu 2 D
n
g
i
= n
1=3
(P
n
P)
h
f(n
1=3
( F
n
(u) F(t
0
)))
2
(n
1=3
( F
n
(u) F(t
0
)))
2
g1fu 2 D
n
g
i
= nP
n
h
f(n
1=3
( F
n
(u) F(t
0
)))
2
(n
1=3
( F
n
(u) F(t
0
)))
2
g1fu 2 D
n
g
i
+ n
1=3
P
:
Empirical processes arguments show that the first term is o
p
(1) because the
random function that sits as the argument to n
1=3
(P
n
P) can be shown to
be eventually contained in a Donsker class of functions with arbitrarily high
preassigned probability. Hence, up to a o
p
(1) term,
= n
1=3
Z
f(n
1=3
( F
n
(u) F(t
0
)))
2
(n
1=3
( F
n
(u) F(t
0
)))
2
gdG(t)
RSS(
0
)
D
n
= n
1=3
Z
f(n
1=3
( F
n
(u) F(t
0
)))
2
(n
1=3
( F
n
(u) F(t
0
)))
2
gg(t)dt
D
n
Z
n
(n
1=3
( F
n
(t
0
+ hn
1=3
) F(t
0
)))
2
(n
1=3
( F
n
(t
0
+ hn
1=3
) F(t
0
)))
2
o
g(t
0
+ hn
1=3
)dh
=
n
1=3
(D
n
t
0
)
Z
(X
n
(h) Y
n
(h)) g(t
0
) dh + o
p
(1) :
=
n
1=3
(D
n
t
0
)
Now, using Equation (3.5) along with the fact that the set n
1=3
(D
n
t
0
) is
eventually contained in a compact set with arbitrarily high probability, we
conclude that
Z
f(g
a;b
(h))
2
(g
a;b
(h))
2
gdh:
RSS(
0
) !
d
g(t
0
)
There are some nuances involved in the above distributional convergence which
we skip. The next step is to invoke Brownian scaling to relate g
a;b
and g
a;b
to
the \canonical" slope-of-convex-minorant processes g
1;1
and g
1;1
and use this
to express the limit distribution above in terms of these canonical processes.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search