Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
TABLE 9.1: Monte Carlo Simulation Results for B-Splines Sieve MLE of 0
with 1,000 Repetitions for Semiparametric Analysis of Interval-Censored Data
n = 50 n = 100 n = 200
Bias
0.1194
0.0572
0.0196
M-C sd
0.7850
0.4966
0.3422
ASE
0.8649
0.5212
0.3506
95%-CP
97.4%
96.4%
95.6%
and the knots are evenly placed in (0; 5) in the rst example and (0; 1) in the
second example.
Simulation 1: Interval-Censored Data. We generate the data in a way
similar to what was used in Huang and Rossini (1997). For each subject, we
independently generate Xi i = (U i ;V i ; i;1 i;2 ;Z i ), for i = 1; 2; ;n, where
Z i Bernoulli(0:5); we simulate a series of examination times by the partial
sum of inter-arrival times that are independently and identically distributed
according to exp(1); then Ui i is the last examination time within 5 at which
the event has not occurred yet and V i is the first observation time within 5 at
which the event has occurred; the event time is generated according to the Cox
proportional hazards model (tjz) = t exp(z) for which the true parameters
are 0 = 1 and 0 (t) = t. Similarly, a Monte Carlo study with 1,000 repetitions
is performed and the corresponding results are displayed in Table 9.1.
The results show that both bias and Monte Carlo standard deviation de-
crease as sample size increases. The proposed least-squares estimate of the
standard error may overestimate the true value but the overestimation lessens
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search