Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
fore, that the targeted minimum loss-based estimator of
0
is
h
Q
1;
1;n
(O
i
)
i
:
X
1
n
Q
1;
0;n
Q
0;
1;n
(O
i
) Q
0;
n
=
=
0;n
i=1
In this case, additional targeting steps do not result in further fluctuation from
the above estimates, and the algorithm is complete after a single step. In other
words, one round of targeting suces to achieve maximal bias reduction.
8.3.3
Asymptotic Results
The methodology proposed above is an example of a double-robust estimation
procedure. Specifically, the estimator
n
constructed will be consistent for the
statistical parameter of interest, provided either the initial estimators Q
2;n
,
Q
1;n
, and Q
0;n
are consistent for Q
2;0
, Q
1;0
, and Q
0;0
, respectively, or the
estimators g
0n
(a) and g
1n
(a) are consistent for g
0
(a) and g
1
(a), respectively.
A certain level of misspecification of working models used to estimate the
various ingredients required in the procedure is allowed without sacrificing
the consistency of the overall procedure; in practice, this is a particularly
useful property.
The estimator
n
constructed using the methodology presented is asymp-
totically linear; this follows directly from the fact that (i)
n
= (Q
n
) with
a pathwise differentiable parameter, (ii) Q
n
solves the ecient influence curve
estimating equation
X
1
n
D
(Q
n
;g
n
)(O
i
) = 0
i=1
where D
= D
1
D
0
, Q
n
is the targeted minimum loss-based estimator of
Q, and g
n
= (g
0n
;g
1n
), and from (iii) required regularity conditions explicitly
stated in van der Laan and Rose (2011), including, in particular, the consis-
tency of at least one of g
n
and Q
n
. In particular, when g is known exactly so
that g
n
= g
0
, the influence curve of
n
is given by
IC
0
= D
(Q
0
;g
0
)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search