Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 7.9 Passive earth pressure for a cohesionless soil with a horizontal upper surface.
7.4.2  Sloping soil surface
The directions of the principal stresses are not known, but we assume that the passive pressure acts paral-
lel to the surface of the slope. The analysis gives:
cos
β
+
(cos
2
β
cos
2
φ
)
K p =
cos
β
cos
β
(cos
2
β
cos
2
φ
)
7.4.3  Rankine's assumption on wall friction
The amount of friction developed between a retaining wall and the soil can be of a high magnitude (par-
ticularly in the case of passive pressure). The Rankine theory's assumption of a smooth wall with no fric-
tional effects can therefore lead to a significant underestimation (up to about a half) of the true K p value.
The theory can obviously lead to conservative design which, although safe, might at times be over-safe
and lead to an uneconomic structure.
7.5  Rankine's theory: cohesive soils
7.5.1  Effect of cohesion on active pressure
Consider two soils of the same unit weight, one acting as a purely frictional soil with an angle of
shearing resistance, φ , and the other acting as a cohesive-frictional soil with the same angle of shearing
resistance, φ , and an effective cohesion, c . The Mohr circle diagrams for the two soils are shown in
Fig. 7.10.
At depth, h, both soils are subjected to the same major principal stress
=
σ
γ
h . The minor principal
1
stress for the cohesionless soil is
σ 3 but for the cohesive soil it is only
σ 3c , the difference being due to the
cohesive strength, c , that is represented by the lengths AB or EF.
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search