Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 7.9
Passive earth pressure for a cohesionless soil with a horizontal upper surface.
7.4.2 Sloping soil surface
The directions of the principal stresses are not known, but we assume that the passive pressure acts paral-
lel to the surface of the slope. The analysis gives:
cos
β
+
(cos
2
β
−
cos
2
φ
′
)
K
p
=
cos
β
cos
β
−
(cos
2
β
−
cos
2
φ
′
)
7.4.3 Rankine's assumption on wall friction
The amount of friction developed between a retaining wall and the soil can be of a high magnitude (par-
ticularly in the case of passive pressure). The Rankine theory's assumption of a smooth wall with no fric-
tional effects can therefore lead to a significant underestimation (up to about a half) of the true K
p
value.
The theory can obviously lead to conservative design which, although safe, might at times be over-safe
and lead to an uneconomic structure.
7.5 Rankine's theory: cohesive soils
7.5.1 Effect of cohesion on active pressure
Consider two soils of the same unit weight, one acting as a purely frictional soil with an angle of
shearing resistance,
φ
′
, and the other acting as a cohesive-frictional soil with the same angle of shearing
resistance,
φ
′
, and an effective cohesion, c
′
. The Mohr circle diagrams for the two soils are shown in
Fig.
7.10.
At depth, h, both soils are subjected to the same major principal stress
′
=
σ
γ
h
. The minor principal
1
stress for the cohesionless soil is
σ
3
but for the cohesive soil it is only
′
σ
3c
, the difference being due to the
′
cohesive strength, c
′
, that is represented by the lengths AB or EF.