Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
By lemma1,
P + S
0
S
< 0
(6)
H 2
C 1
C 2
H 2
P 1
G 0
G 1
H 1
Pre-and post-multiplying the matrix (16) by diag ( I, I, I, P 1 ) , let X =
P 1 ,W = P 1 SP 1 ,Y = KX , we have inequality (7), It can be proved.
4 Numerical Example
Consider the uncertain time-delay system (1), and as is known
A 0 =
,A 1 =
14
0
10 . 5
10 . 1
1
B 0 = B 1 = 0
1
,D 0 = 0 . 1
,D 1 = 0 . 1
,D 2 = 0 . 1
0 . 1
0 . 1
0 . 1
D 1 = 0 . 1
,D 2 = 0 . 1
0 . 1
0 . 1
E 0 = 0 . 20 . 3
0 . 10 . 4
,E 1 = 0 . 20 . 4
0 . 10 . 3
,E 2 = 0 . 20 . 1
0 . 30 . 4
we are known from theorem 2 using Matlab to solve
X = 0 . 1291
,Y =
0 . 4304
0 . 2015
0 . 1291
0 . 2015 0 . 9243
K = YX 1 =
1 . 0362
2 . 6174
thus passive controller of the system can be designed
u ( k )= YX 1 x ( k )=
2 . 6174 x 1 ( k )
1 . 0362 x 2 ( k )
References
1. Dugard, L., Verriest, E.I.: Stability and Control of Time-delay Systems. Springer,
Berlin (1998)
2. Chen, T., Francis, B.: Optimal Sampled-Data Control System. Springer, New York
(1995)
3. Wu, J.F., Wang, Q., Chen, S.B.: Robust stability for sampled-data systems. Control
Theory & Applications 18(8), 99-102 (2001)
4. Cui, B.T., Hua, M.G.: Robust passive control for uncertain discrete-time systems
with time-varying delays. Chaos Solitons & Fractials 29(2), 331-341 (2006)
Search WWH ::




Custom Search