Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 6.2 Research studies carried out with pediocin in a variety of food substrates
against a variety of target bacteria
Food
Target bacteria
References
Salad dressings
Lactobacillus biofermentans
Gonzalez (1989)
Fresh beef
Leuconostoc mesenteroides
Kalchayanand (1990)
Vacuum-packed beef
Leu. mesenteroides
Rozbeh et al . (1993)
Fermented sausage
Listeria monocytogenes
Berry et al . (1991),
Foegeding et al . (1992),
Cheun et al . (2000)
Beef by-products
L. monocytogenes
Motlagh et al . (1992),
Ray (1992)
Ground beef, sausage mix
L. monocytogenes, L. ivanovii
Holla (1990)
Cottage cheese, ice cream mix
Leu. mesenteroides
Meat paste
La. curvatus
Coventry et al . (1995)
Fish fi llets
L. monocytogenes
Yin et al . (2007)
Sous vide products
Bacillus subtilis, B.
licheniformis
Cabo et al . (2009)
Note: Research studies carried out with pediocin in a variety of food substrates against a variety of
target bacteria.
spectrum, being active against various strains of Lactobacillus spp. and importantly
against Listeria spp. (Schillinger and Lücke 1989; Lewus et al. 1991; Motlagh
et al. 1991; Sobrino et al. 1991; Tichacaczek et al. 1994; Hugas et al. 1995). An
exception is sakacin B which apparently has no activity against Listeria spp.
(Samelis et al. 1994). Purifi ed preparations of sakacin are not legally approved, so
most interest in their use are either by production 'in situ' by protective cultures
or in undefi ned fermentates.
6.2.3 Undefi ned fermentates
The use of spray-dried undefi ned fermentates produced by GRAS status lactic
acid bacteria notably Lc. lactis and Propionibacterium freundrencherii as culture
organisms as a means of food preservation occurred fi rst in the late 1980s and
early 1990s in the US with the introduction of MicroGARD™ (Weber and Broich
1986; Ayres et al. 1987, 1992, 1993). Since the original MicroGARD™ product
was introduced, various types aimed at specifi c target organisms have been
marketed (Table 6.3).
It must be stressed that the effi cacy of such fermentates, regardless of source of
organism, cannot be ascribed to a single antimicrobial factor but to a combination
of organic acids and antimicrobial peptides such as bacteriocins and peptides. An
important difference between these undefi ned fermentates and nisin and natamycin
preparations is that they are not purifi ed by downstream processing and so can be
simply labelled as cultured milk or dextrose powder depending on the fermentation
substrate. Their active ingredients are not declared. This in some countries,
notably the US, results in extremely friendly labelling when used in processed
￿ ￿ ￿ ￿ ￿
Search WWH ::




Custom Search