Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
[48] F. Aubépart and N. Franceschini, Bio-inspired optic
flow sensors based on FPGA: application to micro-air-
vehicles,
Microproc Microsys
31
(2007), 408-419.
[49] J. Chahl and A. Mizutani, Biomimetic attitude and ori-
entation sensors,
IEEE Sens J
12
(2012), 289-297.
[50] D.C. O'Carroll, Feature-detecting neurons in dragon-
flies,
Nature
362
(1993), 541-543.
[51] R.S.A. Brinkworth and D.C. O'Carroll, Robust models
for optic flow coding in natural scenes inspired by
insect biology,
PLoS Comput Biol
5
(2009), 1-14.
[52] J.G. Daugman, Uncertainty relation for resolution in
space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by
two-dimensional visual cortical filters,
J. Opt. Soc. Am.
A
2
(1985), 1160-1169.
[53] J.G. Daugman, Complete discrete 2-D Gabor trans-
forms by neural networks for image analysis and com-
pression,
IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process
36
(1988), 1169-1179.
[54] E.H. Adelson and J.R. Bergen, Spatiotemporal energy
models for the perception of motion,
J Opt Soc Am A
2
(1985), 284-299.
[55] A. Borst, Models of motion detection,
Nat Neurosci
Suppl
3
(2000), 1168.
[56] J. Haag, W. Denk, and A. Borst, Fly motion vision is
based on Reichardt detectors regardless of the signal-to-
noise ratio,
Proc Natl Acad Sci
101
(2004), 16333-16338.
[57] A. Borst and M. Egelhaaf, Principles of visual motion
detection,
Trends Neurosci
12
(1989), 297-306.
[58] S.B. Laughlin and R.C. Hardie, Common strategies for
light adaptation in the peripheral visual systems of fly
and dragonfly,
J Comp Physiol
128
(1978), 319-340.
[59] B.K. Dean, C.H.G. Wright, and S.F. Barrett, The design
of an analog module for sensor adaptation to changes
in ambient light,
ISA Biomed Sci Intrum
45
(2009),
185-190.
[60] B.K. Dean, C.H.G. Wright, and S.F. Barrett, Advances
in sensor adaptation to changes in ambient light: a bio-
inspired solution,
ISA Biomed Sci Intrum
46
(2010),
20-25.
[61] B.K. Dean, C.H.G. Wright, and S.F. Barrett, Preliminary
tests of a possible outdoor light adaptation solution of
a fly inspired visual sensor: a biomimetic solution,
ISA
Biomed Sci Intrum
47
(2011), 147-152.
[62] H.K. Hartline, H.G. Wagner, and F. Ratliff, Inhibition in
the eye of the limulus,
J Gen Physiol
39
(1956),
651-673.
[63] K.H. Strube,
Musca domestica inspired vision sensor car-
tride modeling
, Master's thesis, University of Wyoming
(2010).
[64] N. Petkov, T. Lourens, and P. Kruizinga, Lateral inhibi-
tion in cortical filters,
Proceedings of the international
conference on digital signal processing and international
conference on computer applications to engineering systems
(1993), 122-129.
[65] M.V. Srinivasan, S.W. Zhang, M. Lehrer, and
T.S. Collett, Honeybee navigation en route to the goal:
visual flight control and odometry,
J Exp Biol
199
(1996),
237-244.
[66] R. Hardie, Functional organization of the fly retina, in
Progress in sensory physiology
, vol. V (D. Ottoson, ed.),
Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA (1985), 1-79.
[67] V. Braitenberg and P. Debbage, A regular net of recipro-
cal synapses in the visual system of the fly
Musca
domestica
,
J Comput Physiol
90
(1974), 25-31.
[68] V. Braitenberg, Patterns of projection in the visual
system of the fly: I. retina-lamina projections,
Exp Brain
Res
3
(1967), 271-298.
[69] A.W. Snyder, Acuity of compound eyes: physical limi-
tations and design,
J Comp Physiol
116
(1977), 161-182.
[70] A.W. Snyder, D.G. Stavenga, and S.B. Laughlin, Spatial
information capacity of compound eyes,
J Comp Physiol
116
(1977), 183-207.
[71] A.W. Snyder, Physics of vision in compound eyes, in
Handbook of sensory physiology
, vol. VII/6A (H. Autrum,
ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA (1979),
225-313.
[72] L.A. Popp, E.S. Tomberlin, S.F. Barrett, and
C.H.G. Wright,
Musca domestica
lamina monopolar cell
response to visual stimuli and their contribution to
early motion detection,
ISA Biomed Sci Intrum
43
(2007),
134-139.
[73] E.S. Tomberlin,
Musca domestica's large monopolar cell
responses to visual stimuli
, Master's thesis, University of
Wyoming (2004).
[74] M. Juusola and A.S. French, Visual acuity for moving
objects in first- and second-order neurons of the fly
compound eye,
J Neurophysiol
77
(1997), 1487-1495.
[75] B. Pick, Specific misalignments of rhabdomere visual
axes in the neural superposition eye of dipteran flies,
Biol Cybern
26
(1977), 215-224.
[76] V. Braitenberg and H. Hauser-Holschuh, Patterns of pro-
jection in the visual system of the fly: II. Quantitative
aspects of second-order neurons in relation to models of
movement perception,
Exp Brain Res
16
(1972), 184-209.
[77] M. Wilcox, D. Thelen Jr., G. Peake, S. Hersee, K. Scott,
and C. Abdallah, An analog model of the retinal infor-
mation processing in the eye of the fly,
Proceedings of the
6th NASA symposium on VLSI design
(1997), 3.4.1-3.4.15.
[78] M.J. Wilcox and D.C. Thelen Jr., A retina with parallel
input and pulsed output, extracting high-resolution
information,
IEEE Trans Neural Networks
10
(1999),
574-583.
[79] N. Strausfeld and J. Campos-Ortega, The L4 monopolar
neuron: a substrate for lateral interaction in the visual
system of the fly,
Brain Res
59
(1973), 97-117.
[80] D.W. Arnett, Spatial and temporal integration proper-
ties of units in first optic ganglion of dipterans,
J Neu-
rophysiol
35
(1972), 429-444.