Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
humans as a privileged species. On the contrary, nature protection sees human
activity as the main source of disturbance in the natural environment. It seems that
this statement is hardly acceptable by man since we are inclined to believe in the
superiority of human interests by our child-rearing, school education, religion and
any disturbance of these beliefs raises conscious or subconscious protest. Irre-
spective of various de
nitions, nature protection in its practical aspect focuses on
these elements of biodiversity (species, genes, ecosystems or landscapes) which are
presently endangered. In practice, a common species seldom becomes the object of
interest from representatives of nature protection. If, however, this species faces a
threat, then it becomes the object of their activity, proportional to the scale of
endangerment. So, the author does not see a greater interest in the protection of the
rook in Poland, of the raven recently increasing in number or of poor fox blamed for
posing a threat to many species. Instead, the object of concern is once common
species which are now endangered like the partridge, the black grouse, the northern
lapwing, wolf etc. It thus appears that man cannot be the object of interest of nature
protection specialists since our species is not endangered, especially in the global
scale. It also appears that sometimes objectionable thesis that
a frog is more
important than man
is most justi
ed since it re
fl
ects the sense of nature protection
activity. All amphibians in our country are
on the list of
protected species, many of them are threatened and so refusing the frog its priority
would negate the message every nature protector is guided by.
Laborious explanation of the above-mentioned priorities of current nature pro-
tection should be a base of each programme of ecological education since our society
is permanently fed with inconsistent information on this protection by various
groups of interest. Meanwhile, the most important paradigm of currently understood
nature protection is to prevent the domination of any of these groups whose interests
may be contradictory and may lead to the preference or extermination of various
species. For example, dead wood
and probably will be
an important condition of preserving biodiver-
sity in forest ecosystem
is a source of threat for a forester because some xylobionts
(organisms living in wood) may pose a deadly threat to tree stands. The hare craved
by hunters is hated by orchard owners, as is the starling for which we otherwise hang
nesting boxes in parks. Anglers are eager to stock Polish waters with carp
an alien
and invasive species which replaces native benthic-feeding
fish species. Hunters are
happy to see the mou
fl
on and the fallow deer in our forests
both alien to Polish
fauna and competitive for the European red deer.
6.2 Environmental Role of Land Reclamation
There are no such land reclamations that would be favourable for nature in the wild.
Though it now seems obvious, several years ago one could
find slogans on positive
role of land reclamation without explaining the environmental context. Neverthe-
less, one had to agree that there are no really natural places in Poland. This may be a
Search WWH ::




Custom Search