Java Reference
In-Depth Information
1.020000e+01
10.200000
10.2000
2.079000e-06
0.000002
2.07900e-06
'1.97e+03'
0x1.1709e564a6d14p-19
The following snippet of code shows the effects of using
width
and
precision
in floating-point number formatting:
System.out.printf("%.2e %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("%.2f %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("%.2g %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("'%8.2e' %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("'%8.2f' %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("'%8.2g' %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("'%10.2e' %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("'%10.2f' %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("'%10.2g' %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("'%-10.2e' %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("'%-10.2f' %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("'%-10.2g' %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("'%010.2e' %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("'%010.2f' %n", 1969.27);
System.out.printf("'%010.2g' %n", 1969.27);
1.97e+03
1969.27
2.0e+03
'1.97e+03'
' 1969.27'
' 2.0e+03'
' 1.97e+03'
' 1969.27'
' 2.0e+03'
'1.97e+03 '
'1969.27 '
'2.0e+03 '
'001.97e+03'
'0001969.27'
'0002.0e+03'
