Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
Many PI-
Wolbachia
are distributed in the B group, but a few also occur in the A group (Werren
et al., 1995; Gottlieb et al., 1998; Zhou et al., 1998; Plantard et al., 1999; Vavre et al., 1999; van
Meer et al., 1999; von der Schulenburg et al., 2000). When we review these studies and calculate
the percentage of PI-
Wolbachia
in both groups, using only those
Wolbachia
cases where the
phenotype has been established, we Ýnd PI-
Wolbachia
in 28% (10 of 36) of the
Wolbachia
in group
A and 54% (20 in 37) in group B.
Only in
Trichogramma
spp. do PI-
Wolbachia
show a clear phylogenetic pattern. Independent of
the studied gene,
wsp
,
ftsZ
, or 16S rDNA, these
Wolbachia
always form a separate cluster. Schilthuizen
and Stouthamer (1997) studied the phylogenetic relationships between PI-
Wolbachia
and their
Tri-
chogramma
hosts in detail. A comparison of the phylogenetic tree of the host species with the tree
of
Wolbachia
in these species showed them to be incongruent. The major reason for this incongruence
is most likely horizontal transfer of the
Wolbachia
among different
Trichogramma
species.
Do PI-
Wolbachia
differ in this respect from
Wolbachia
inducing other effects? At present we
cannot make strong statements concerning this pattern because our sample size is too small. For
parasitoids of the genus
Aphytis
several PI-
Wolbachia
-infected lines have been sequenced using
the
ftsZ
gene (Gottlieb et al., 1998). In this genus, the
ftsZ
sequence of the
Wolbachia
is identical,
suggesting that here too we Ýnd a high similarity of PI-
Wolbachia
within the genus. Similar
patterns are also found to some extent in CI-inducing
Wolbachia
, for example, the sibling species
of
Nasonia
spp. carry similar
Wolbachia
. The same applies to
Culex
spp. (Zhou et al., 1998).
Wolbachia
in
Diplolepis
, most likely associated with PI, show an extraordinary pattern: the
Wolbachia
in Ýve
Diplolepis
species from France cluster together in the B group, whereas Ýve
other PI-
Wolbachia
from North American species are distributed over the A and the B group
(Plantard et al., 1999). This distribution would be consistent with the hypothesis that the pecu-
liarities of the host induce the PI effect. The
Leptopilina
spp. are a very interesting case because
here CI- and PI-
Wolbachia
exist within the same genus. The pattern we observe is that all CI-
Wolbachia
in
Leptopilina
are distributed over the A group, mostly associated with the
Wolbachia
of their host species (Vavre et al., 1999), but the PI-
Wolbachia
in
L. clavipes
and
L. australis
occur in a separate cluster in the B group.
Besides Schilthuizen and Stouthamer (1997), many other phylogenetic studies detected indirect
evidence of horizontal transfer (OÔNeill et al., 1992; Stouthamer et al., 1993; Rousset and Solignac,
1995; Werren et al., 1995; Vavre et al., 1999). Host-to-parasitoid and parasitoid-to-parasitoid trans-
fer of
Wolbachia
has been considered mainly as potential transmission routes. Horizontal transmis-
sion was shown for PI-
Wolbachia
by Huigens et al. (2000): horizontal transfer of PI-
Wolbachia
between
T. kaykai
parasitoids occurs when they share the same food source.
HOST FITNESS: HIGHER COSTS OF CARRYING
WOLBACHIA
IN MIXED POPULATIONS
The effects of
Wolbachia
on the Ýtness of its host are inÞuenced by the following factors: trans-
mission route, presence of a genomic conÞict between
Wolbachia
and host, and the physiological
cost of carrying bacteria. The relationship between
Wolbachia
and its host can range from an
adversarial relationship in populations where only a fraction of the females is infected with the PI-
Wolbachia
(under these circumstances we expect a genomic conÞict in which the nuclear genes of
the host may try to suppress the
Wolbachia
or its effect) to a completely mutualistic relationship
in which the infection with
Wolbachia
in a host population has gone to Ýxation and all females of
a population are infected with
Wolbachia
.
T
RANSMISSION
R
OUTE
Since the early part of the 20th century, the evolution of parasite virulence has received much
attention. Although PI-
Wolbachia
are not true parasites but nonobligatory symbionts, theories on