Global Positioning System Reference
In-Depth Information
EGM08 in terms of root mean square errors of geoid heights, these models can be employed
to obtain regional orthometric heights from GNSS heights for the applications that require a
decimetre level accuracy in heights.
*Model
Degree
Data
Citation
EGM96
360
Satellite, gravity, altimetry
Lemoine et al., 1998
EGM08 a
360
GRACE, gravity, altimetry
Pavlis et al., 2008
EGM08 b
2190
GRACE, gravity, altimetry
Pavlis et al., 2008
EIGEN-6C
1420
GOCE, GRACE, LAGEOS, gravity, altimetry
Förste et al., 2011
EIGEN-6S
240
GOCE, GRACE, LAGEOS
Förste et al., 2011
EIGEN-51C
359
GRACE, CHAMP, gravity, altimetry
Bruinsma et al., 2010
GGM03C
360
GRACE, gravity, altimetry
Tapley et al., 2007
GGM03S
180
GRACE
Tapley et al., 2007
GOCO02S
250
GOCE, GRACE
Goiginger et al., 2011
* Related to the global geopotential models that were used in the study: i -) The adopted reference
system is GRS80, ii -) The applied models are in tide free system, iii -) Zero degree terms were included in
computations, iv -) The model coefficients are available from ICGEM (2011).
Table 1. Validated global geopotential models in the study
Some other conclusions drawn from the statistical inspection of the validation results that
EGM08 provided improved results compared to its previous version EGM96 in the study
region (compare the statistics of EGM96 and EGM08 a in Table 2). Among the satellite only
models EIGEN-6S fits best, and as such, can be recommended as a reference model for a
future regional geoid of Turkey with R-R technique.
Model
max
Type
min.
max.
mean
std. dev.
EGM96
360
Combined
-183.1
336.5
38.2
156.3
EGM08 a
360
Combined
-105.0
47.6
-18.1
36.4
EGM08 b
2190
Combined
-58.6
27.0
-4.5
17.3
EIGEN-6C
1420
Combined
-41.9
28.3
-4.1
15.8
EIGEN-6S
240
Satellite only
-77.5
85.0
-9.7
43.2
EIGEN-51C
359
Combined
-126.2
50.5
-21.8
38.9
GGM03C
360
Combined
-151.2
213.0
-2.4
76.3
GGM03S
180
Satellite only
-394.3
331.4
-18.5
198.1
GOCO02S
250
Satellite only
-87.2
90.9
-8.6
43.5
Table 2. Statistics of the geoid height differences between global models and observations
(in centimetre)
The geoid height differences of EIGEN-6C and EIGEN-6S global models from the observed
geoid heights at the reference benchmarks are illustrated in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.
These differences can be compared and interpreted considering the topographic map of
Turkey in Figure 1.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search