Response Evaluation - Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering - page 258

Chapters 1 and 3 dealt with general and specifi c aspects, respectively, of the ' Demand ' imposed by
earthquakes on structures. On the other hand, Chapters 2 and 4 dealt with general and specifi c issues,
respectively, of 'Supply' or 'Capacity' for action and deformation resistance of structures subjected to
earthquakes. It provides comprehensive tools for the construction of analytical models of varying
degrees of complexity and for the defi nition of forcing functions of varying degrees of detail that should
be imposed on the analytical models, with the aim of obtaining reliable estimates of response. In the
simplest applications, the topic provides suffi cient guidance for the construction of a lumped-parameter
single-degree-of-freedom structure subjected to a static force representing the earthquake action. It also
provides, in the same level of detail, guidance to construct fi bre - based detailed fi nite element idealiza-
tions of complex structures subjected to time-varying ground excitation records. All practical scenarios
between the above two extremes are also catered for. Throughout the topic, simple examples are used
to provide guidance on the application of the described fundamental methods and models. A specifi c
building is used as a threading example that links the various load and structure modelling issues of
Chapter 4, the closing chapter. The set of summary slides and additional worked examples are an asset
for graduate education.
The authors hope that their approach for discussing earthquake engineering in the context of supply
and demand, projected in triads of return periods, engineering limit states and performance objectives,
will appeal to both educators and graduate students as it has appealed through the years to a wide variety
of students at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, USA.
References
Akiyama , H. ( 1985 ). Earthquake - Resistant Limit - State Design for Buildings . University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan.
Allen , D.E. ( 1975 ). Limit states design: A probabilistic study . Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering , 2 ( 1 ), 36 - 49 .
Anderson , J.C. and Gurfi nkel , G. ( 1975 ). Seismic behaviour of framed tubes . Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics ,
4 ( 2 ), 145 - 162 .
Antoniou , S. and Pinho , R. ( 2004a ). Advantages and limitations of adaptive and non - adaptive force - based pushover procedures .
Journal of Earthquake Engineering , 8 ( 4 ), 497 - 522 .
Antoniou , S. and Pinho , R. ( 2004b ). Development and verifi cation of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. Journal
of Earthquake Engineering , 8 ( 5 ), 643 - 661 .
Aydinoglu , M.N. ( 2004 ). An improved pushover procedure for engineering practice: incremental response spectrum analysis (IRSA).
Proceedings of the Workshop “Performance-based seismic design. Concepts and implementation.” PEER Report No.2004/05 , pp.
345 - 356 .
Baker , J.W. and Cornell , C.A. ( 2003 ). Uncertainty specifi cation and propagation for loss estimation using FOSM methods. Pacifi c
Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER Report 2003/07, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA,
USA.
Baker , J.F. and Heyman , J. ( 1969 ). Plastic Design of Frames 1: Fundamentals . Cambridge University Press , Cambridge, England.
Balendra , T. ( 1993 ). Vibration of Buildings to Wind and Earthquake Loads . Springer - Verlag , London, UK .
Balendra , T. and Huang , X. ( 2003 ). Overstrength and ductility factors for steel frames designed according to BS 5950. Journal of
Structural Engineering, ASCE , 129 ( 8 ), 1019 - 1035 .
Bathe , K.J. ( 1996 ). Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis . Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
Bazzurro , P. and Cornell , C.A. ( 1994 ). Seismic Hazard Analysis of Nonlinear Structures I: Methodology . Journal of Structural
Engineering, ASCE , 120 ( 11 ), 3320 - 3344 .
Berry , M.P. ( 2006 ). Performance Modeling Strategies for Modern Reinforced Bridge Columns . PhD Thesis, Department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Washington, DC, USA.
Bertero , V.V. ( 1977 ). Strength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments . In Structural Engineering and
Structural Mechanics , K.S. Pister , Ed., Prentice - Hall , Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA , pp. 211 - 215 .
Bommer , J.J. , Elnashai , A.S. and Weir , A.G. ( 2000 ). Compatible acceleration and displacement spectra for seismic design codes .
Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, Paper No. 207, CD- ROM .
Bozorgnia , Y. and Bertero , V.V. ( 2004 ). Earthquake Engineering. From Engineering Seismology to Performance- Based Engineer-
ing . CRC Press , Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Bracci , J.M. , Kunnath , S.K. and Reinhorn , A.M. ( 1997 ). Seismic performance and retrofi t evaluation of RC structures. Journal of
Structural Engineering, ASCE , 123 ( 1 ), 3 - 10 .
Broderick , B.M. and Elnashai , A.S. ( 1996 ). Seismic response of composite frames. I - Response criteria and input motions. Engi-
neering Structures , 18 ( 9 ), 696 - 706 .