Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
2.4.2.2
Kalman Detector for Equalization
The channel estimate given by (2.80) is fed into an equalizer for symbol detection.
Another Kalman filter, together with a quantizer, acts as the symbol detector at the
receiver end. The state and the measurement equations are now given by
() =
( ) + () + () ,
s
n
Φ
s
n
1
Γ
sn
Γ
sn
(2 . 81)
d
d
() = ()() + () ,
hs
T
yn
nnvn
(2.82)
d
d
where
T
() := () ( )
( )
,
s d
ns ns n
1
s nd
() := ({}
,, () := () () ,
sn
sn
Esn
sn sn
T
0
0
0
T
d
T
Φ
:=
,
Γ:=
10
,
d
I
d
d
T
() := ( ) ()
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ ;; ( )
h
nhn
0
h n
1
h n
L
0
,
d
dL
where integer d L ; it will also be the equalization delay. Assume data symbols are zero
mean and white. If s ( n ) is a data symbol, we have s ( n ) = 0, ˜ ( n ) = s ( n ); if s ( n ) is a training
symbol, s ( n ) = s ( n ), s ( n ) = 0. Details of Kalman filtering of the system described by (2.81)
and (2.82) can be found in [34].
2.4.3
Symbol-Adaptive Joint Channel Estimation
and Data Detection
Representative approaches in this category are [27, 34] and references therein. A Gauss-
Markov model for channel variations (typically an autoregressive model) is coupled
with a state-space model for received data to form an augmented state-space model with
nonlinear measurement equation. This results in a nonlinear state estimation problem.
In [27] a finite-length minimum mean square error (MMSE) DFE is used during non-
data-aided periods to generate hard decisions. Reference [34] presents a low-complexity
turbo equalization receiver for coded signals where a nonlinear Kalman filtering-based
adaptive equalizer is coupled with a soft-in soft-out decoder. These approaches work well
so long as the channel does not fade too fast.
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search