Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
(2.5-4 cm) laminated to cross-laminated packstone to grainstone (divisions
T
b
and T
c
) with an assemblage of discrete trace fossils (
Thalassinoides
,
Teich-
ichnus
,
Phycodes
, and
Ancorichnus
?); and (3) an upper heavily bioturbated
wackestone (divisions T
d
and T
e
)with
Planolites
,
Chondrites
,or
Taenidium
(
Fig. 10
B). Interbedded background limestones contain poorly preserved bur-
rows, including
Zoophycos
,
Planolites
, and/or
Thalassinoides
, none of which
penetrate into subjacent turbidites. Based on these observations,
Miller et al.
(2004)
concluded that the ichnofabrics of these calciturbidites reflect the work
of distinct short-lived associations of endobenthic organisms contemporaneous
with and immediately following event deposition. Notably, the four ichnotaxa
identified in these turbidites (
Ancorichnus
?,
Thalassinoides
,
Teichichnus
,
and
Phycodes
) are apparently intimately associated with one another as com-
pound structures (
Fig. 10
B) and may represent the work of crustacean trace-
makers, possibly ones that were transported by associated turbidity currents.
Very similar compound structures attributed to allochthonous crustaceans
recently have been documented in siliciclastic storm beds in siliceous shelf
deposits (
Savrda et al., 2010
).
So, to what ichnofacies can calciturbidite trace-fossil suites be assigned? In
the general absence of pre-depositional traces, assignment to the
Nereites
Ich-
nofacies is difficult to justify. Given the evidence that post-depositional traces
in many calciturbidites reflect unique event-related benthic communities,
assignment to a distinct ichnofacies may be favorable.
Bromley and Asgaard
(1991)
and
Bromley (1996)
argued that suites of post-depositional structures
that result from the work of transient opportunistic or pioneer communities
in turbidites and storm beds warrant consideration as the
Arenicolites
Ichnofa-
cies. Assignment of calciturbidites to this ichnofacies, after some modification
of its diagnostic description to account for a greater variety of traces and asso-
ciated behaviors, may be most appropriate.
7. SUMMARY
Throughout the post-Triassic, but particularly during the Cretaceous, chalk and
related carbonates accumulated in a significantly broad array of deep- to
shallow-marine depositional regimes. When integrated with sedimentological
observations, trace-fossil assemblages can be employed to discriminate these
regimes and the depositional processes that operated therein, for instance, slow
pelagic deposition
versus
mass-transport mechanisms. Broad ichnological dif-
ferences between ichnofacies (e.g.,
Zoophycos versus Cruziana
ichnofacies), as
well as within ichnofacies (e.g.,
Zoophycos
Ichnofacies assemblages with or
without
Thalassinoides
), can help recognize general paleobathymetric gradi-
ents. Moreover, ichnological variations at the bedding scale (e.g., alternation
of low
versus
high diversity
Zoophycos
Ichnofacies assemblages or overprint-
ing of
Zoophycos
Ichnofacies suites by
Glossifungites
and
Trypanites
ichnofa-
cies associations) can be used to decipher short-term changes in benthic
Search WWH ::
Custom Search