Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
TABLE 3
Ichnotaxa with Paleothermometrical Relevance, Given with their Known or Inferred Producers, Known Stratigraphic
Range, and Today's Biogeographic Distribution (XX
rare) as Reported by
Radtke et al. (1997)
,
Lukas and Golubic
(1981)
,
Akpan and Farrow (1984)
,
Schmidt and Freiwald (1993)
,
Vogel et al. (2000)
,
Bundschuh and Balog (2000)
,
Radtke and
Golubic (2005)
,
Wisshak (2006, 2008)
,
Wisshak and Porter (2006)
,
Golubic and Radtke (2008)
and
Bromley et al. (2007)
,
Wisshak et al. (2011)
, and Complemented by own Observations—Cont'd
¼
common; X
¼
Ichnotaxon
Biotaxon (type)
Warm-
temperate
Cold-
temperate
Stratigraphic range
Tropical
Arctic
Rhopalia spinosa
Radtke and Golubic, 2005
? (chlorophyte)
Eocene-recent
XX
X
Saccomorpha sphaerula
Radtke, 1991
Lithopythium gangliiforme Bornet and Flahault, 1889 (fungus)
Eocene-recent
XX
X
X
X
b
Flagrichnus baiulus
Wisshak and Porter, 2006
? (fungus?)
Oligocene-recent
XX
X
Saccomorpha cf. terminalis
Radtke, 1991
c
Arborella kohli Zebrowski, 1937 (fungus)
Paleocene-recent
XX
X
X
b
Semidendrina pulchra Bromley et al., 2007
Globodendrina monile Plewes et al., 1996 (foraminiferan?)
Carboniferous-recent
XX
X
Entobia mikra
Wisshak, 2008
? (sponge)
Pleistocene-recent
X
XX
X
a
Only those Planobola macrogota that resemble Cyanosaccus piriformis.
b
Cold, deep, or upwelling water only.
c
Alternative ichnospecies description in progress.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search