Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
TABLE 3
Ichnotaxa with Paleothermometrical Relevance, Given with their Known or Inferred Producers, Known Stratigraphic
Range, and Today's Biogeographic Distribution (XX
rare) as Reported by Radtke et al. (1997) , Lukas and Golubic
(1981) , Akpan and Farrow (1984) , Schmidt and Freiwald (1993) , Vogel et al. (2000) , Bundschuh and Balog (2000) , Radtke and
Golubic (2005) , Wisshak (2006, 2008) , Wisshak and Porter (2006) , Golubic and Radtke (2008) and Bromley et al. (2007) ,
Wisshak et al. (2011) , and Complemented by own Observations—Cont'd
¼
common; X
¼
Ichnotaxon
Biotaxon (type)
Warm-
temperate
Cold-
temperate
Stratigraphic range
Tropical
Arctic
Rhopalia spinosa Radtke and Golubic, 2005
? (chlorophyte)
Eocene-recent
XX
X
Saccomorpha sphaerula Radtke, 1991
Lithopythium gangliiforme Bornet and Flahault, 1889 (fungus)
Eocene-recent
XX
X
X
X b
Flagrichnus baiulus Wisshak and Porter, 2006
? (fungus?)
Oligocene-recent
XX
X
Saccomorpha cf. terminalis Radtke, 1991 c
Arborella kohli Zebrowski, 1937 (fungus)
Paleocene-recent
XX
X
X b
Semidendrina pulchra Bromley et al., 2007
Globodendrina monile Plewes et al., 1996 (foraminiferan?)
Carboniferous-recent
XX
X
Entobia mikra Wisshak, 2008
? (sponge)
Pleistocene-recent
X
XX
X
a Only those Planobola macrogota that resemble Cyanosaccus piriformis.
b Cold, deep, or upwelling water only.
c Alternative ichnospecies description in progress.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search