Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
genutzt werden, um die Ergebnisse wissenschaftlicher Fallstudien in den politi-
schen und legislativen Prozess einzuspeisen. In diesem Zusammenhang wird es
wichtig sein, die Arbeit und Erfahrung der gegenwärtig durchgeführten SUP zu
Agrokraftstoffen und Nachhaltigkeitsstandards zu berücksichtigen.
Zitierte Literatur
Abaza H, Bisset R, Sadler B (2004) Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental
assessment: towards an integrated approach. UN Environmental Program, Nairobi
Aheto DW (2009) Implication analysis for biotechnology regulation and management in Africa.
Baseline studies for assessment of potential effects of genetically modified maize (Zea mays
L.) cultivation in Ghanaian agriculture. Peter Lang, Basel, Frankfurt/M
Aheto DW, Reuter H, Breckling B (2011) A modelling assessment of geneflow in small-
holder agriculture in West Africa. Environ Sci Eur 23(9). doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/
2190-4715-23-9
Andow DA, Birch ANE, Dusi AN, Fontes EMG, Hilbeck A, Lang A, Lövei GL, Pires CSS, Sujii
ER, Underwood E, Wheatley RE (2006) Non-target and biodiversity risk assessment for gene-
tically modified (GM) crops. Proceedings of 9th international symposium on the biosafety of
genetically modified organisms, Jeju Island, Korea, pp 68-73
Andow DA, Hilbeck A (2004) Science-based risk assessment for nontarget effects of transgenic
crops. BioScience 54:637-649
Andow DA, Hilbeck A, Nguyen VT (2008) Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified
organisms, Volume 4: Challenges and opportunities with Bt cotton in Vietnam. Cabi Publishing,
Wallingford
Andow DA, Zwahlen C (2006) Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants. Ecol Lett
9:196-214
Anonymus (2010) EU GMO proposals draw widespread criticism. EurActiv Network, Brussels,
14.07.2010
Berg P, Baltimore D, Nathans D, Boyer HW, Roblin R, Cohen SN, Watson JD, Davis RW, Weiss-
man S, Hogness DS, Zinder ND (1974) Potential biohazards of recombinant DNA molecules.
Proc Natl Acad Sci 71:2593-2594
Breckling B (2010) Assessing Systemic Risks. Contribution to the Scientific Conference &
Citizen Forum: Advancing the Understanding of Biosafety. Scientific Findings, Policy Res-
ponses and Public Participation - Social Sustainability and Biological Safety. Nagaoya/Japan,
7.-8.10.2010,
http://www.ensser.org/activities/meetings/biosafety-conference-nagoya/
;
http://
www.ensser.org/uploads/media/KN4-Breckling-EN.pdf
;
http://www.ensser.org/uploads/pics/
KN4_Breckling.pdf
Breckling B, Laue H, Pehlke H (2011a) Remote sensing as a data source to analyse regional
implications of genetically modified plants in agriculture - Oilseed rape (
Brassica napus
)
in Northern Germany. Ecological Indicators 11(4):942-950. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
ecolind.2009.03.003
Breckling B, Reuter H, Middelhoff U, Glemnitz M, Wurbs A, Schmidt G, Schröder W, Windhorst
W (2011b) Risk indication of genetically modified organisms (GMO): modelling environ-
mental exposure and dispersal across different scales. Ecological Indicators 11(4):936-941.
doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.002
Briggs DJ (2008) A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic
risks. Environ Health 7:61-78
Brush S, Chauvet M (2004) Assessment of social and cultural effects associated with transgenic
maize production. Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Quebec
Buckley R (2000) Strategic environmental assessment of policies and plans: legislation and
implementation. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 18:209-215
Search WWH ::
Custom Search