Quality Assurance in Requirements Management - Requirements Engineering and Management for Software Development Projects - page 99

Table 6.1 Review feedback form

Review Feedback Report
1. Project name:

2. Name of the artifact being reviewed, with version number:

3. Name(s) of the reviewer(s):

4. Name of the author of the artifact:

5. Date(s) on which the review is conducted:

6. Type of review: independent / guided individual / group postal / meeting

Defects uncovered during the audit (use an additional sheet if required)
Defect
ID

Defect
description

Reference
to process for
the defect

Status
(open /
closed)

Defect
origin

Closed
on

Signature of the lead reviewer:
Date of signature:

Corrective actions implemented
Corrective action implemented Defect IDs covered by

this corrective action

Any comments

Signature of the author:
Date of signature:

Defect closure actions (to be filled in by the lead reviewer)

I have verified and found that all the defects described above are closed satisfactorily,
except the following defects, which are retracted or pending

1.
2.
3.

Signature of the lead reviewer:
Date of signature:

Table 6.1 provides a suggested format for recording the feedback of the review.
It is possible that the feedback is directly fed into a defect reporting tool, It is not
necessary that the feedback is in paper form.