Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
37. Strathern JN, Klar AJS, Hicks JB, et al. Homothallic switching of yeast mating type cassettes is
initiated by a double-stranded cut in the MAT locus.
Cell
1982;
31
:183-92.
38. Bzymek M, Thayer NH, Oh SD, Kleckner N, Hunter N. Double Holliday junctions are
intermediates of DNA break repair.
Nature
2010;
464
:937-41.
39. Mahaney BL, Meek K, Lees-miller SP. Repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-
strand breaks by non-homologous end-joining.
Biochem J
2009;
417
:639-50.
40. Hartlerode AJ, Scully R. Mechanisms of double-strand break repair in somatic mammalian
cells.
Biochem J
2009;
423
:157-68.
41. Krogh BO, Symington LS. Recombination proteins in yeast.
Annu Rev Genet
2004;
38
:233-71.
42. Fishman-Lobell J, Rudin N, Haber JE. Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair
that are kinetically separable and independently modulated.
Mol Cell Biol
1992;
12
:1292-303.
43. Lin FL, Sperle K, Sternberg N. Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA
into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process.
Mol Cell Biol
1984;
4
:1020-34.
44. Maryon E, Carroll D. Involvement of single-stranded tails in homologous recombination of
DNA injected into Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclei.
Mol Cell Biol
1991;
11
:3268-77.
45. Lundblad V, Blackburn EH. An alternative pathway for yeast telomere maintenance rescues
est1-senescence.
Cell
1993;
73
:347-60.
46. Garvik B, Carson M, Hartwell L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants
may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. [Published erratum appears in Mol
Cell Biol 1996;16(1):457.].
Mol Cell Biol
1995;
15
:6128-38 .
47. Hackett JA, Greider CW. End resection initiates genomic instability in the absence of
telomerase.
Mol Cell Biol
2003;
23
:8450-61.
48. Malkova A, Naylor ML, Yamaguchi M, Ira G, Haber JE. RAD51-dependent break-induced
replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conver-
sion.
Mol Cell Biol
2005;
25
:933-44.
49. Branzei D, Foiani M. Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle.
Nat Rev Mol Cell
Biol
2008;
9
:297-308.
50. Heller RC, Marians KJ. Replication fork reactivation downstream of a blocked nascent
leading strand.
Nature
2006;
439
:557-62.
51. Sonoda E, Sasaki MS, Buerstedde JM, et al. Rad51-deficient vertebrate cells accumulate
chromosomal breaks prior to cell death.
EMBO J
1998;
17
:598-608.
52. Tsuzuki T, Fujii Y, Sakumi K, et al. Targeted disruption of the Rad51 gene leads to lethality in
embryonic mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1996;
93
:6236-40.
53. Prakash S, Johnson RE, Prakash L. Eukaryotic translesion synthesis dna polymerases: spec-
ificity of structure and function.
Annu Rev Biochem
2005;
74
:317-53.
54. Andreassen PR, Ho GPH, D'Andrea AD. DNA damage responses and their many interactions
with the replication fork.
Carcinogenesis
2006;
27
:883-92.
55. Branzei D, Foiani M. Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled
replication forks.
DNA Repair (Amst)
2007;
6
:994-1003.
56. Higgins NP, Kato K, Strauss B. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells.
J Mol Biol
1976;
101
:417-25.
57. Mimitou EP, Symington LS. DNA end resection: many nucleases make light work.
DNA
Repair (Amst)
2009;
8
:983-95.
58. Lobachev K, Vitriol E, Stemple J, Resnick MA, Bloom K. Chromosome fragmentation after
induction of a double-strand break is an active process prevented by the RMX repair complex.
Curr Biol
2004;
14
:2107-12.
59. McKee AH, Kleckner N. Mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that block meiotic prophase
chromosome metabolism and confer cell cycle arrest at pachytene identify two new
meiosis-specific genes SAE1 and SAE3.
Genetics
1997;
146
:817-34.
