Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
14. Keeney S. Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation.
Curr Top Dev Biol
2001;
52
:1-53.
15. Klapholz S, Waddell CS, Esposito RE. The role of the SPO11 gene in meiotic recombination
in yeast.
Genetics
1985;
110
:187-216.
16. Kleckner N. Meiosis: how could it work?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1996;
93
:8167-74.
17. Cromie GA, Smith GR. Branching out: meiotic recombination and its regulation.
Trends Cell
Biol
2007;
17
:448-55.
18. Alani E, Padmore R, Kleckner N. Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an
intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination.
Cell
1990;
61
:419-36.
19. Liu J, Wu TC, Lichten M. The location and structure of double-strand DNA breaks induced
during yeast meiosis: evidence for a covalently linked DNA-protein intermediate.
EMBO J
1995;
14
:4599-608.
20. Masson JY, Davies AA, Hajibagheri N, et al. The meiosis-specific recombinase hDmc1 forms
ring structures and interacts with hRad51.
EMBO J
1999;
18
:6552-60.
21. Masson JY, West SC. The Rad51 and Dmc1 recombinases: a non-identical twin relationship.
Trends Biochem Sci
2001;
26
:131-6.
22. Kantake N, Sugiyama T, Kolodner RD, Kowalczykowski SC. The recombination-deficient
mutant RPA (rfa1-t11) is displaced slowly from single-stranded DNA by Rad51 protein.
J Biol
Chem
2003;
278
:23410-7.
23. Wang X, Haber JE. Role of Saccharomyces single-stranded DNA-binding protein RPA in the
strand invasion step of double-strand break repair.
PLoS Biol
2004;
2
:E21.
24. Moens PB, Kolas NK, Tarsounas M, Marcon E, Cohen PE, Spyropoulos B. The time course
and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are
compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal
recombination.
J Cell Sci
2002;
115
:1611-22.
25. Housworth EA, Stahl FW. Crossover
interference in humans.
Am J Hum Genet
2003;
73
:188-97.
26. Kneitz B, Cohen PE, Avdievich E, et al. MutS homolog 4 localization to meiotic chromosomes
is required for chromosome pairing during meiosis in male and female mice.
Genes Dev
2000;
14
:1085-97.
27. Stahl FW.
Genetic recombination.
San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co. 1979.
28. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.
Mol Cell
2010;
40
:179-204.
29. Heyer WD, Ehmsen KT, Liu J. Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes.
Annu
Rev Genet
2010;
44
:113-39.
30. Holliday RA. A mechanism for gene conversion in fungi.
Genet Res
1964;
5
:282-304.
31. Orr-Weaver TL, Szostak JW. Yeast recombination: the association between double-strand gap
repair and crossing-over.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1983;
80
:4417-21.
32. Orr-Weaver TL, Szostak JW. Multiple, tandem plasmid integration in Saccharomyces cerevi-
siae.
Mol Cell Biol
1983;
3
:747-9.
33. Moynahan ME, Jasin M. Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and
suppresses tumorigenesis.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
2010;
11
:196-207.
34. Wu L, Hickson ID. DNA helicases required for homologous recombination and repair of
damaged replication forks.
Annu Rev Genet
2006;
40
:279-306.
35. Ferguson DO, Holloman WK. Recombinational repair of gaps in DNA is asymmetric in
Ustilago maydis and can be explained by a migrating D-loop model.
Proc Natl Acad Sci
1996;
93
:5419-24.
36. Nassif N, Penney J, Pal S, Engels WR, Gloor GB. Efficient copying of nonhomologous
sequences from ectopic sites via P-element-induced gap repair.
Mol Cell Biol
1994;
14
:1613-25.
