Graphics Programs Reference
In-Depth Information
determined based on the specific project being undertaken, the skills and
desires of the file creators, and the capabilities and policies of the firm
that will create the high-resolution film output .
http://www.binarygraphics.com/glossary/workflow.html
I think it is useful to discuss some pipeline philosophies, which applies
not only to color management but to digital imaging as a whole. First is
the concept of “the best methods” and “the right methods.” Often there
are many different ways to use the tools in Photoshop and elsewhere to
accomplish a specific effect or goal. There are experts and pundits who
will tell you what they believe are the best methods to process a file or
set up some kind of imaging pipeline. I would agree that there are tech-
niques that will produce optimal image quality, but sometimes these are
at the expense of processing speed or added complexity.
For example, there are times when a user will want to process an
image for output and will have options over various settings that can
affect the final interpretation (rendering) of the resulting color. The best
way to process these images is to do so, one at a time, while previewing
the various options. Then select that which produces the best visual
appearance for each file. However, if the current job is to produce a
catalog with 1000 images of widgets on a white background and the job
has to be done in a timely fashion, this process will likely cause a severe
issue with the deadline. Will viewing each file and deciding upon the
ideal setting play a very profound role in the final quality? As you'll see
and experience, maybe yes, maybe no.
Automating the processes after conducting a few tests could be con-
sidered “flying blind.” However, at the end of the day, the client is expect-
ing a job completed on time and on budget. Conducting the process the
best way might produce a very slight improvement in quality, but can
anyone see it? If the deadline calls for 1000 images and only 200 are
completed, the pipeline is flawed and the client is unhappy. Though it
may be true that 20 percent of the files have slightly better image quality,
this may or may not be perceived as acceptable by the client paying your
bill! I will try whenever possible to point out when the “best way” and
the “right way” of working is an appropriate method in a particular
pipeline. Ultimately you have to decide which pipeline to use based on
the current requirements of the job.
Color management is simply one very small portion of your digital
imaging pipeline of which multiple pipeline options are available. This
pipeline is a chain of events and the ultimate quality and success is only
as reliable as the weakest link in this chain. You can have almost all your
ducks in a row when it comes to color management, or how you process
your digital files, and one wrong move can destroy the quality of the final
image. I am a strong believer in GIGO: Garbage In, Garbage Out! Color
management doesn't allow you to be negligent in how you capture, edit,
or output your digital files. I often hear users complain that color
Search WWH ::




Custom Search