Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
Now the normalized surrogate log-likelihood function in (4.6) can be written
as
1
L
ln
p
(
y
1
L
ln
|
α
(
ω
)
,
Q
(
ω
))
=−
M
ln
π
−
|
D
(
ω
)
|
1
L
[
y
)]
H
D
−
1
(
−
−
α
(
ω
)
ρ
(
ω
ω
)[
y
−
α
(
ω
)
ρ
(
ω
)]
(5.37)
where
ρ
(
ω
) and
D
(
ω
)are defined as
e
j
ω
0
a
(
ω
)
.
e
j
ω
(
L
−
1)
a
(
ρ
(
ω
)
(5.38)
ω
)
and
Q
(
ω
)
0
.
.
.
.
D
(
ω
)
(5.39)
0
Q
(
ω
)
Substituting (5.30) into (5.37), we obtain the joint surrogate log-likelihood of
γ
and
µ
:
1
L
ln
p
(
γ
L
−
1
)]
H
,
µ
|
α
(
ω
)
,
Q
(
ω
))
=
LM
ln
π
−
ln
|
D
(
ω
)
|−
[
S
g
γ
+
S
m
µ
−
α
(
ω
)
ρ
(
ω
)]
+
D
−
1
(
×
ω
)[
S
g
γ
+
S
m
µ
−
α
ω
)
ρ
(
ω
,
(5.40)
(
C
J
where
C
J
is a constant that accounts for the Jacobian of the nonunitary transfor-
mation between
y
and
γ
and
µ
in (5.30).
To derive the EM algorithm for the current set of assumptions, we note that
for given ˆ
Q
i
−
1
(
i
−
1
(
α
ω
) and
ω
), we have (as in (5.18)-(5.20))
θ
i
−
1
µ
|
γ
,
∼
CN
(
b
,
K
)
,
(5.41)
where
E
µ
θ
i
−
1
b
=
|
γ
,
)
S
g
S
g
)
S
g
−
1
γ
)
(5.42)
S
m
ρ
(
S
m
D
i
−
1
(
D
i
−
1
(
S
g
ρ
(
i
−
1
(
i
−
1
(
=
ω
) ˆ
α
ω
)
+
ω
ω
−
ω
) ˆ
α
ω
Search WWH ::
Custom Search